nick1985
Lifer
- Dec 29, 2002
- 27,153
- 6
- 81
Oh and this obsession with FOX is hilarious too.
Seriously most of his posts are about Fox News. It's really unhealthy.
Oh and this obsession with FOX is hilarious too.
pssttt... only 1 of the 3 you mentioned are white... can you guess which one?
lol, you BHO fluffers that want to try to make everything about race. It's like you see racism no matter what the actual facts are. typical left wing play. Oh and this obsession with FOX is hilarious too.
Hahah, someone with a Reagan picture claiming that leftists are the real racists. Such amazing levels of retardation from the rightwingers.
pssttt... only 1 of the 3 you mentioned are white... can you guess which one?
lol, you BHO fluffers that want to try to make everything about race. It's like you see racism no matter what the actual facts are. typical left wing play. Oh and this obsession with FOX is hilarious too.
Putting pictures up of black people is racist now?
Trying to figure out whether you are an ostrich or ignorant.
Here's how it went down. We need to change this story to make Obama look like he hangs out with thugs. They put hip-hop in the title since a lot of their loyal watchers believe this narrative.
We couldn't put Tom Hanks in the headline, my god Obama parties with all types of people. We can't use Stevie Wonder or Herbie Hancock because the are not threatening. It would have been a quaddruple jackpot if one of the attendees had been a famous muslim
Not hard to figure out.
I'm sure it went down like that in your mind, but as noted, it seems your mind looks for things to trigger that "RACIST" card... so...since you like to whine about FOX and you leftists have continually tried to beat the "RACIST" drum against anyone who dares question the great bho... sorry if everyone doesn't come running in to agree with you and your version of what "went down".
No. What is racist is talking about how this president has now officially ruined the credit rating of the United States during his enrich-the-banksters looting spree.
where was the great leader Jessie Jackson in all this bbq mayhem ?? The ole nut crusher seems to be odd man out .
Until you answer why Tom Hanks was omitted you rants are meaningless
On the contrary, it seems their leader, Rupert Murdoch, is anything but a failure.If they would have put 4 white people on the article people would be screaming racism too. 4 men? SEXISM!
Unfortunately screaming racism at every issue does not solve any of our problems. I guess it makes the simple minded feel better about their failure of a leader though.
I don't care why hanks wasn't pictured or mentioned in the headline. I'm not the one wailing and moaning about some perceived racism here - I'm merely laughing at you twits who can't let anything FOX does go without trying to whine about it or try to make things about race when in reality it most likely had zero to do with racism.
oh and i'm not sure why you are picking out hanks only now - did you not realize he was the only white one of the 3 you mentioned before when you posted it?![]()
I mentioned it in the OP you knucklehead. Not my fault you can't read or know the definition of race baiting
Can't ID the subtext in this??
Compare the pictures in the headline to the pictures they did not include...
Tom Hanks, Stevie Wonder, Herbie Hancock??
Remember to be effective in race baiting by a media organization it can't be overt. That's why E.D. Hill was fired from Fox because she was too loud about the agenda.
What blows my mind is how entertainers are given such important status so that they are invited to Presidential birthday parties. This world is crazy. ...Or is it just this country? Do the leaders of other countries invite self important clowns of the entertainment world to their birthday parties?
In my mind, this is not about race, this is about what we uphold as valuable in this country.
note- Stevie Wonder is an exception to the above as he greatly contributed to American culture in a positive and valuable way.
Of course, that's why his picture didn't make the headline. Proving my point.
