R600 die pics

JAG87

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2006
3,921
3
76

hardwareking

Senior member
May 19, 2006
618
0
0
i guess they rotated the die so as to accomodate the 512bit bus and to reduce EM noise from the PCB.
If u put the substrate the die is placed on as a square u'd notice that the die is rotated around 45 degrees.
 

Praxis1452

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,197
0
0
Originally posted by: keeleysam
That die is fvcking HUGE!

I don't even want to think about the cooling it'll need.

Nvidia die is also huge but we haven't seenit yet heh
 

keeleysam

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2005
8,131
0
0
Originally posted by: Praxis1452
Originally posted by: keeleysam
That die is fvcking HUGE!

I don't even want to think about the cooling it'll need.

Nvidia die is also huge but we haven't seenit yet heh

Yes, but knowing ATI it'll run extra hot.
 

ronnn

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
3,918
0
71
Originally posted by: keeleysam
Originally posted by: Praxis1452
Originally posted by: keeleysam
That die is fvcking HUGE!

I don't even want to think about the cooling it'll need.

Nvidia die is also huge but we haven't seenit yet heh

Yes, but knowing ATI it'll run extra hot.

Can't judge new tech by a companies old tech. That would be like saying the 8800gtx has inferior default iq with a shimmer. Soon we will find out who the power pig winner is.
 

josh6079

Diamond Member
Mar 17, 2006
3,261
0
0
That would be like saying the 8800gtx has inferior default iq...
Actually, some would say that the 8800GTX has an inferior default iq, but not with a shimmer. The xS modes are still absent from any 8800 driver and until they return the 8800GTX has a lesser quality AA than the 7 series.
 

Conky

Lifer
May 9, 2001
10,709
0
0
I just hope it keeps up.

Things start to suck and get expensive when one company takes too much of a lead.
 

hardwareking

Senior member
May 19, 2006
618
0
0
keep in mind that die is supposed to be on the 80nm process.I guess ATI was wise to move to 80nm.I can only imagine how much heat and power that thing would have consumed if it were on 90nm.
I bet it packs a whole more transistors than the G80.(in keeping with ATI's tradition of adding transistors to increase performance)
 

keeleysam

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2005
8,131
0
0
Originally posted by: hardwareking
keep in mind that die is supposed to be on the 80nm process.I guess ATI was wise to move to 80nm.I can only imagine how much heat and power that thing would have consumed if it were on 90nm.
I bet it packs a whole more transistors than the G80.(in keeping with ATI's tradition of adding transistors to increase performance)

I don't even want to imagine how bad the yields will be on it though.

It'll be damn expensive.