Ding.Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
I'd put the extra money into ceiling or attic insulation before bumping up the walls.
Originally posted by: redly1
Are they using fiberglass batts to achieve R20? $1200 isn't too bad for the extra R value...unless the house is tiny...how large and what style of house?
Is this a common practice in your area?
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Seriously though, you're building a house that you're only going to live in for about 5 years? Why?
Originally posted by: JMWarren
I probably should have added that I probably won't be there for more than 5 years, so I'm not sure it will pay back in that time period. The Attics are already R55...
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
I would go for it. It is not only for the R factor but it also reduces noises as this will go on top of the stud, not inbetween. So it will be more quiet as well which will help resale the house. Juts take pictures to show it is there and point out, when you sale, how quiet it is. Its little things like that people will over look.
Also check to see if there are any power discount since it has that type and Rfactor of insulation from the power company?
Originally posted by: Scarpozzi
Might want to research compression of the insulation over the years. I have insulation in my ceilings that I caught a glimpse of last summer. Gravity has taken its toll...
That being said, you might want to look for an insulation solution that is going to totally SEAL the walls and worry more about air leaks than actual R factor. Then, in another 30-40 years, look into upgrading...that will take care of longevity.
I'd personally rather put that 1200 to use in getting better windows. They are where you REALLY lose heat in the winter.