I am quite surprised. Fuji CDRs given a rating of BAD ? does this make sense ?
Consistently the opinion of techies here on this board is that Fujifilm CDRs are among the best available CDRs (up there with Kodak and Mitsumi).
Yet at this site:
http://www.cdmediaworld.com/hardware/cdrom/cd_quality.shtml
url
Which one would assume would be an authoritative site,
They are listed as not just medium, but outright BAD. And Imation, among others, are listed as GOOD.
Does this ring true to you guys ?
There is the obvious factor of the Taiwan versus the Taiyo Yuden (Japan) made Fuji CDRs, but one would think that some distinction would be made on this presumably authoritative site (CDMEDIAWOLRD.COM)
Consistently the opinion of techies here on this board is that Fujifilm CDRs are among the best available CDRs (up there with Kodak and Mitsumi).
Yet at this site:
http://www.cdmediaworld.com/hardware/cdrom/cd_quality.shtml
url
Which one would assume would be an authoritative site,
They are listed as not just medium, but outright BAD. And Imation, among others, are listed as GOOD.
Does this ring true to you guys ?
There is the obvious factor of the Taiwan versus the Taiyo Yuden (Japan) made Fuji CDRs, but one would think that some distinction would be made on this presumably authoritative site (CDMEDIAWOLRD.COM)
