- Jun 21, 2005
- 12,040
- 2,254
- 126
Can someone explain this to me?
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/other/display/atx-psu5_14.html
"The PSU is declared to have three +12V lines with a max combined current of 50A and a limitation of 18A on each line. However, the PSU manual informs that the lines are united into one when the limitation is exceeded. In other words, there is no actual division of the lines inside the PSU, but the user has already got used to the idea that there must be several 12V outputs, so the manufacturer couldn?t but specify several such lines on the PSU label. Of course, the lack of a ?virtual? splitting of the +12V power rail into several output lines has no effect at all on the PSU?s voltage stability or output power."
read more about the fake rails here:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/other/display/atx-psu5.html
So does this mean that all the stuff about multiple rails is BS??
So we don't have to be careful about putting different components (CPU and GPU(s)) on different 12V lines?
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/other/display/atx-psu5_14.html
"The PSU is declared to have three +12V lines with a max combined current of 50A and a limitation of 18A on each line. However, the PSU manual informs that the lines are united into one when the limitation is exceeded. In other words, there is no actual division of the lines inside the PSU, but the user has already got used to the idea that there must be several 12V outputs, so the manufacturer couldn?t but specify several such lines on the PSU label. Of course, the lack of a ?virtual? splitting of the +12V power rail into several output lines has no effect at all on the PSU?s voltage stability or output power."
read more about the fake rails here:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/other/display/atx-psu5.html
So does this mean that all the stuff about multiple rails is BS??
So we don't have to be careful about putting different components (CPU and GPU(s)) on different 12V lines?