Question that has been puzzleing me

Cawchy87

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2004
5,104
2
81
I was thinking about the movie caddyshack and how that little kid had to carry that huge bag. Then i thought, would 2 kids be able to carry that bag? So here is my question. If there were 2 straps on the bag, both kids were exactly the same hight, same distance away from the bag, same angle to the bag, same hieght of straps etc. (lets just say all the stars aligned on this one). Would each of the kids be carrying half the weight of the bag? Would it even be easier to carry at all? I have been very tempted to try this with my golf buddies but i am sure they would be weirded out. Thanks for replies, and for keeping my mind moving during summer break (can't get enough physics).
 

imported_Nail

Senior member
May 23, 2004
218
1
0
"That bag"?

One end of a golf club is heavier than the other. I don't know how heavy a golf bag is or what sort of kids these were, but the weight would be distributed at least to some degree.
 

bigrod

Senior member
May 12, 2004
288
1
81
Yes, each would carry half the weight if everything was exactly even.

Statics is fun.
 

jhu

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
11,918
9
81
it's more physics than statistics (unless you're using quantum mechanics to figure out the weight distribution of two kids carrying one bag, in which case it's both physics and statistics).
 

Witling

Golden Member
Jul 30, 2003
1,448
0
0
I agree that each kid would be carrying half the weight but the force on each kid might be considerably more than the weight of the bag. It depends on how they carry the bag. "Weight" in the English system of measurement is a force. When the bag is carried in a position where the force is other than straight down, such as each strap going off at an angle from the bag, the force on the kids is greater than the weight of the bag although the downward component of the force is equal to the bag's weight. This is why the natives in cartoons always tie the jaguar's legs together in pairs and run a poll through. Each native is experiencing the jaguar's weight as a force downward rather than at an angle as they would experience if they each grabbed two legs.
 

bigrod

Senior member
May 12, 2004
288
1
81
I didn't say "Statistics," I said "Statics," big difference.

He also said each kid would have the strap at the same angle, so the vertical component of the force the bag exerts due to gravity would be equal for each child.
 

Cawchy87

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2004
5,104
2
81
Originally posted by: bigrod
I didn't say "Statistics," I said "Statics," big difference.

He also said each kid would have the strap at the same angle, so the vertical component of the force the bag exerts due to gravity would be equal for each child.

it would be equal... but would it be half?
 

bigrod

Senior member
May 12, 2004
288
1
81
Yes, it would be precisely half of the vertical component given the conditions you have specified.
 

Calin

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2001
3,112
0
0
But walking could be a problem - if they don't synchronize their steps perfectly, the weight would move from one to the other, and might break their equilibrium (making them to fall).
Many times I choose to carry alone bags, so I won't have to synchronize with someone else

Calin
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
Originally posted by: bigrod
I didn't say "Statistics," I said "Statics," big difference.

He also said each kid would have the strap at the same angle, so the vertical component of the force the bag exerts due to gravity would be equal for each child.

Yeah, but it really the next class... Dynamics. It is easy in statics on level ground. What if kid A steps up a step while B stays in the same place. A has to increase the potential energy, pull against B possibly (or fight B if B really likes where he is), and may have the weight plus the additional force on A.

No wonder they invented golf carts ;)
 

crazychicken

Platinum Member
Jan 20, 2001
2,081
0
0
yup, as bigrod says, the force would be exactly split in half, otherwise there would be some force floating around..... and enough of this man made force could be dangerous...
 

conorvansmack

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2004
5,041
0
76
The amount of force required to lift it would always be the same, but Calin was right in saying that the equilibrium would shift depending on how the caddies walked. If there was a way to maintain the bag in a completely stable state in which none of the materials inside moved around and the caddies synchronized their steps to keep the bag from shifting, then yes, I think they would each be carrying half of the weight.

Who picks it up first?
 

bigrod

Senior member
May 12, 2004
288
1
81
The point was that they were exactly the same height and the straps were at exactly the same angle. The system is in equilibrium, so I answered it accordingly. There are of course infinitely many variations upon the problem if you want to consider it in a dynamic environment, but that was not the question.
 

Cawchy87

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2004
5,104
2
81
Originally posted by: crazychicken
yup, as bigrod says, the force would be exactly split in half, otherwise there would be some force floating around..... and enough of this man made force could be dangerous...

LOL, your right, that would be scary! Thanks for the replies everyone and now i need to find something else to think about at work! The reason i gave that so much thought was because i have only completed grade 11 physics so we haven't learned about that yet and it was interesting. Otherwise you guys probibly think i am a moron.
 

jaydee

Diamond Member
May 6, 2000
4,500
4
81
Originally posted by: Cawchy87
Would each of the kids be carrying half the weight of the bag? Would it even be easier to carry at all?

Yes and yes.

Otherwise, the European swallows wouldn't be able to carry the coconuts with a strand of creeper under their dorsal guiding feathers.
 

bigrod

Senior member
May 12, 2004
288
1
81
Originally posted by: Cawchy87
Originally posted by: crazychicken
yup, as bigrod says, the force would be exactly split in half, otherwise there would be some force floating around..... and enough of this man made force could be dangerous...

LOL, your right, that would be scary! Thanks for the replies everyone and now i need to find something else to think about at work! The reason i gave that so much thought was because i have only completed grade 11 physics so we haven't learned about that yet and it was interesting. Otherwise you guys probibly think i am a moron.

You'll do lots of equilibrium problems, especially if you go into any kind of engineering. I'm an EE and I did a ton.
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
Originally posted by: jaydee
Originally posted by: Cawchy87
Would each of the kids be carrying half the weight of the bag? Would it even be easier to carry at all?

Yes and yes.

Otherwise, the European swallows wouldn't be able to carry the coconuts with a strand of creeper under their dorsal guiding feathers.

WAIT! I thought coconuts migrated! Oh well.

Otherwise you guys probibly think i am a moron.

Nah, just curious. Keep it up.
 

kcbass

Golden Member
Mar 15, 2001
1,378
0
71
Well now that that question is settled, here's another one for ya....why would 2 caddies want to carry the same bag? In all fairness, I'm an ECE, but I feel that philosophy also deserves it's time in the spotlight 
 

Smilin

Diamond Member
Mar 4, 2002
7,357
0
0
The bag is not going to pull directly downward if it's hanging between them. In that case, yes they would each carry an equal amount of weight but they are likely expending more than 1/2 the energy each carrying it. There would be some added "work" overhead since they would pull against each other as they walk.