Question on -EX

ilkhan

Golden Member
Jul 21, 2006
1,117
1
0
So beckton is supposed to be on s1567 (# IIRC) to accommodate the memory and extra QPI links it needs. If Intel wanted to, could be easily cut off the extra memory controllers and QPI links and sell those 8 core wonders on s1366?
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
64
91
I'm sure it could be done, the dual-socket capable -EP is single-socket compatible and the extra QPI sits unused.

But if Dunnington is an example of Intel's intentions of "forced" market segmentation by a product's physical specifications then I would argue that -EX will not be touching single-socket systems, which means no s1366.
 

alyarb

Platinum Member
Jan 25, 2009
2,425
0
76
ASUS has had dual-socket 1366 boards out for some time. Why don't you just go that route if you want 8 cores? sure, you have to buy xeon bloomfields. but uh if you were willing to pay for beckton parts...
 

ilkhan

Golden Member
Jul 21, 2006
1,117
1
0
I was actually thinking of just trying to get more cores on a single socket than gulftown will provide. Theoretical exercise, really.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
64
91
Originally posted by: alyarb
in the 3ghz region i would expect lower performance per watt with beckton because it's a 45nm part that's going to be larger than tukwila, yet wikipedia lists the same 130w TDP while tukwila is closer to 200w. how can this be?

http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/...009/0212/kaigai_4l.gif

wiki for cpu specs on unreleased hardware is pretty unreliable.

But as for how Tukwilla could be higher TDP than beckton...what is the cache/logic xtor ratio for the two?

130W for Beckton...clockspeed must be pretty low when 16 threads are running to make that happen.