• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Question for divorcees

I live in a no fault state...which means you can get a divorce and not have a reason for it. This is how my Ex explained it to me. She said she could be fvcking 50 guys and it wouldn't make a difference on the divorce outcome.

I told here she was well on the way to meet her goal 😉

Ausm
 
I've never been married but I can tell you, she will say anything that gives her an advantage. I'm basing this off almost every ex-gf I've had.
 
not too much personal stuff like that comes up in the court unless you are taking it to trial.

The Judge usually reads the statements to themself, asks each of you are you sure you are in agreement to end this and in the terms outlined. Viola done deal.

Now if kids or substantial property is involved that there is no aggreement on the resolution then it can drag out.

However, both parties have to be careful they make factual statements that have bearing.

Her saying "he is a worthless piece of cr@p" will probaby get her a warning from the judge. Going on with it he can hold a party in contempt. There have been more than one story of some jilted party spending the night in jail after telling the judge "well you can go to hell too if you are on 'their' side'"
 
Here's the context:

Link

This woman's allegations that she was forcibly sodomized don't appear to make any sense.

Just wondering how plausible it is that she's just a bitter ex-spouse.
 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Here's the context:

Link

This woman's allegations that she was forcibly sodomized don't appear to make any sense.

Just wondering how plausible it is that she's just a bitter ex-spouse.
Click to expand...

Interesting tidbit of information: The ex-wife remarried in the same year that she divorced. Her credibility is extremely suspect. Did she divorce because of the alleged abuse or did she divorce to marry someone else? Maybe the claims of abuse are merely sour grapes for a crappy divorce settlement......either way the morons over in that thread merely support my decision to ignore P&N.

Nary a critical thinker in the bunch.

 
It sounds like you're nitpicking the physical aspects of the positions that she must have been in, and when you can't make sense of it, want to throw out her entire story. In fact, if he IN ANY WAY pressured her to have ANY KIND of sexual activity AGAINST HER WILL, then he is in the wrong. If he was emotionally abusive, he is in the wrong. There's no point, in my opinion, in nitpicking this, because we were not there and thus cannot make a good judgement.

It is very likely that she has perfectly valid reasons for wanting to divorce the guy. However, in a general sense, I concede that in any divorce proceeding, distortions could certainly come up, and you run into a "he says this and she says that" situation. And this could happen from both sides.
 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Here's the context:

Link

This woman's allegations that she was forcibly sodomized don't appear to make any sense.

Just wondering how plausible it is that she's just a bitter ex-spouse.
Click to expand...

Of course it was forceful....she kept yelling "HARDER HARDER!!!!" 😀
 
Why are you asking that question? No one seems to be answering it. Did you notice that rip?

People that get divorced are not thrilled with the process regardless of how it came out. One of the reasons they get divorced is that they couldn't deal with their differences. Otherwise they would have remained married. Get it?

I'm still married (hanging on by a thread) after 16 years and some of what my spouse claims is true and some of what I claim about her is true.

Then there's a whole bunch of crap in the grey zone that is up in the air.
 
Nice try, Mr. Rip.

Yes, she could be lying about the actions of the ex.

However, one of the number one test of a Christian leader is how the spouse feeling about the person.
So many times has a preacher put up a front for the whole world, beening successful in it, but been revealed as a phoney by his wife, that I am automatically concerned about this.

I believe that there is an anti-Christian bias in the US today, but if I were innocent, I would not blame my trouble on the media.
I would use every means needed to show to those who will listen that this is false.

When this guy uses the sufferings of hurting people home and abroad to justify himself, it makes me sick.
 
Originally posted by: krcat1
Nice try, Mr. Rip.

Yes, she could be lying about the actions of the ex.

However, one of the number one test of a Christian leader is how the spouse feeling about the person.
So many times has a preacher put up a front for the whole world, beening successful in it, but been revealed as a phoney by his wife, that I am automatically concerned about this.

I believe that there is an anti-Christian bias in the US today, but if I were innocent, I would not blame my trouble on the media.
I would use every means needed to show to those who will listen that this is false.

When this guy uses the sufferings of hurting people home and abroad to justify himself, it makes me sick.
Click to expand...

And how would you prove that allegations like these are false?

 
First, of course, is a lie-detector test.

Second, you could get some ex intel people to indulge themselves in iquiring about your guilt.
There are many right-wing ex-intel people whom would love to help a fellow conservative vindicate himself.

The lefties would still say "lair, lair" and "he has a penis, therefore he is evil', but the moderates would be impressed with his fight for the truth.

What really burns me up is this hurts so many people if he is lying.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top