• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Question/Argument

E

evenmore1

Senior member
Firstly, my friend was upgrading his graphics card from an x200 integrated to a 6800GS. For some reason it wasn't working so he was complaining about it. I thought it was really funny so I said "ha ha!" Of course he retaliated by saying that even his integrated x200 graphics were better than my Nvidia mx-4000. Is this a valid statement? I thought that any sort of dedicated card is better than an integrated (except if there's a 5 year difference) graphics card. So who is right?

btw, he now has x300se....how is that in comparison?
 
Actually his integrated Xpress 200 graphics is likely better than your MX-4000 :laugh:
 
Usually I'd say nothing's worse than integrated graphics......... but I'd also say nothing's worse than a GeForce MX.
 
The MX4000 is the 3rd reincarnation of a budget (read: castrated) DirectX7 engine, six generations old. Still the same engine as the GF2MX.

The ATi X200 is the integrated version of a previous-generation DX9 chip, essentially the X300 engine using system RAM.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top