- Dec 18, 2007
- 681
- 8
- 81
Background: I work for an engineering consulting firm, 1 year into my role as an analyst.
There's 3 other people in my division, all of them are in their 30's.
Our VP always says that it's ok for them not to work that much since they have family/kids, but for me it's not excusable to have normal hours because I'm single.
Is this fair, or is it discrimination?
One guy's 30, one is 33, and one is 38. The 30 year old is the manager, already put in his hours when he was younger. Well established. The 38 year old is a senior engineer, puts in his time. The 33 year old is just an analyst and uses the caveat that his wife works and they need time for the kids.
I'm the only single guy in the firm (youngest too) and all the time I get told that because of that, I'm required to work more. If I was in a role that involved human interaction I would be fine with this, and in a role where the pay raises were nice.
However, my hours involve staring at a computer screen doing engineering calculations all day with no human contact. I'm expected to do that, and complete my work even when the VP wastes my time with useless meetings, I'm expected to put in more time to learn on my own, and I'm expected to train this guy in a different career path how to do my job. My raise for the last year was 1.8%, despite being bumped up from engineer 1 to engineer 2 (a $3.33/hr difference), yet they are charging clients with me listed as an engineer 2.
This is on top of the VP budgeting our projects really low, giving unreasonable deadlines, and every single guy in my division (the backbone of the company) agrees that this is BULLSHIT (how the projects are managed, not my situation).
Is it fair?
There's 3 other people in my division, all of them are in their 30's.
Our VP always says that it's ok for them not to work that much since they have family/kids, but for me it's not excusable to have normal hours because I'm single.
Is this fair, or is it discrimination?
One guy's 30, one is 33, and one is 38. The 30 year old is the manager, already put in his hours when he was younger. Well established. The 38 year old is a senior engineer, puts in his time. The 33 year old is just an analyst and uses the caveat that his wife works and they need time for the kids.
I'm the only single guy in the firm (youngest too) and all the time I get told that because of that, I'm required to work more. If I was in a role that involved human interaction I would be fine with this, and in a role where the pay raises were nice.
However, my hours involve staring at a computer screen doing engineering calculations all day with no human contact. I'm expected to do that, and complete my work even when the VP wastes my time with useless meetings, I'm expected to put in more time to learn on my own, and I'm expected to train this guy in a different career path how to do my job. My raise for the last year was 1.8%, despite being bumped up from engineer 1 to engineer 2 (a $3.33/hr difference), yet they are charging clients with me listed as an engineer 2.
This is on top of the VP budgeting our projects really low, giving unreasonable deadlines, and every single guy in my division (the backbone of the company) agrees that this is BULLSHIT (how the projects are managed, not my situation).
Is it fair?
Last edited:
