Question about weight machines

bandXtrb

Banned
May 27, 2001
2,169
0
0
Always wanted to know this:

Is it disadvantageous to use weight machines over freeweights because of the issue of balancing the weight across both arms/legs? You wouldn't want to work one side more than the other, and you can't really how much you're slacking off with a machine because the handles are kept even, unlike with freeweights.
 

aphex

Moderator<br>All Things Apple
Moderator
Jul 19, 2001
38,572
2
91
Personally i like free weights because your actually lifting that amount of weight. Due to all the pulleys in machines, you need to lift more to get the same effect in them.
 

bandXtrb

Banned
May 27, 2001
2,169
0
0
yeah, but you can adjust the weight so it feels just as challenging.

^bump for the question
 

MrChicken

Senior member
Feb 18, 2000
844
0
0
There is no easy answer for this. The debate will continue forever.

Many machines do allow independent movement of the limbs, that's not really an issue any more. Even the highly marketed home gyms, Bowflex, Soloflex, and Total Gym have this feature.

Free Weights have the advantage of not restricting the range of motion. Meaning that your natural movement during an exercise is not impeeded. That will alow you to use proper form to prevent injury and train the targeted muscles properly. The downside is that also allows the exact opposite to happen also. It is easier to do the exercise incorrectly with free weights.

Machines tend to lock you into doing it their way. This would not be bad if the machine was built just for you, and not for any body of any size and weight. Machines made for a specific exercise in most cases compare well to free weights for ROM. All purpose machines generally do not compare well to free weights for ROM as they are built to a "one size fits all" format.

The debate will rage on because there is no fair way to measure strength gains with the two systems. Exercise specific training will generally provide the best results. If the test is free weight benching, then of course a guy that trains on a machine is going to bench less on that test than if he had trained on free weights, the reverse would be true also on most of the newer machines.
 

Novgrod

Golden Member
Mar 3, 2001
1,142
0
0
Machines are better for old farts. Freeweights are better for everybody else because freeweights work closer to the entire range of the muscle, and they work supporting muscles. This is good for strength, though I suppose a machine would be just as good at building primary muscles you can show your girlfriend.

Balancing the weight across both arms/legs is a non-issue.

I didn't know there was even a debate over which was better, though I suppose now that I think about it, mrchicken is spot-on and it is easier to work out poorly with free weights and potentially injure yourself.