• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Question about the movie "Runaway Jury" *SPOILER ALEEEEEEEEERT*

N

ndee

Lifer
OK, in the end, they did that only because the twin sister of Marlee(sp?) was killed in a shooting and the town of them went bankrupt, right?
 
The worst anti-gun/anti business propaganda movie I've ever seen. I'd have shot the TV, but I was on a plane when I saw it.
 
I hate the way they twisted the original story and made it an anti-gun movie....bad choice if ya ask me.
 
Originally posted by: Johnnie
I hate the way they twisted the original story and made it an anti-gun movie....bad choice if ya ask me.
Click to expand...

Agreed. It started out ok when getting jurors but went south and became an anti-gun propaganda.
Glad I didn't pay full price at the theater to watch this crap.

 
How did Gene Hackman come up with the $15M? Weren't the companies only paying him $7.5M total?
 
it might have some anti-gun element in it but i think the main focus is how they try to twist the jury (we rented it yesterday).

it could be anything... tobacco, mcdonalds... you name it 😛
 
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
it might have some anti-gun element in it but i think the main focus is how they try to twist the jury (we rented it yesterday). it could be anything... tobacco, mcdonalds... you name it 😛
Click to expand...

The book was anti-tobacco, the producers/director took the story and intentionally turned it into a Hollywood agenda movie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top