soccerballtux
Lifer
- Dec 30, 2004
- 12,553
- 2
- 76
Originally posted by: Markbnj
In the end, the developing nations just might end up with a better, greener energy infrastructure than the developed nations have.
I agree. It's always easier to build new than to convince people to change what's already been built. But most of those countries also don't have the appetite for petroleum that we do. Their economies can only go up, for the most part, and they will likely build out the next generation of successful marketplaces based on the new technology. We, on the other hand, have a huge investment in the old stuff. We'll be the Unisys of countries.
If we invent the stuff the other countries adopt we'll be able to afford our oil addiction.
Also, I'm somewhat skeptical about increasing efficiency of solar panels. It doesn't get much simpler than illuminating silicon and harvesting the current flow.
The solution (as usual) is nuclear; both fission and fusion. Lubricating substances can be fabricated, and since we'll be on nuclear we can use electric cars powered by carbon nanotube capacitors. Semis could be a tough one perhaps. I don't know enough about plastics to talk about potential replacementsThe good news is, then we would stop polluting the environment with it!
