Hello.
I just bought a Gainward GF4 Ti4200 video card, updated to the newest NVidia drivers (used a driver cleaner to remove the old NVidia drivers) and then installed Coolbits to overclock the card.
I did a base run with 3dMark2001 with the new drivers set at the default clock speeds (250 mhz core clock and 513 mhz ram speed) and came up with a pretty nice base run.
Then.. I overclocked the card to 300 mhz core clock (previous owner said it would do 300 mhz no problem) and bumped the ram by 20 to around 530 mhz. I ran 3dMark2001 again and only picked up 50 points.
Since my gains were so pathetic (probably my system limiting this), I decided to move the clock settings back to stock because it wasn't worth pushing the card for such a measly gain.
Now.. Here's my question. After I moved the clock speeds back to stock and ran 3dmark2001 again, my scores are 100-200 less than what they were initially with the fresh drivers and the card at stock clock speeds. I tried running the test at different times and even let my system cool overnight and ran it again when the card was nice and cool.
Why would my 3dMark2001 scores be lower now than what they were before I overclocked? The card was overclocked by the previous owner. I only had the card overclocked to run 3dMark once and the card was fine. It didn't get hot. I didn't get any kind of artifacts.
Any ideas?
TIA,
Sal
I just bought a Gainward GF4 Ti4200 video card, updated to the newest NVidia drivers (used a driver cleaner to remove the old NVidia drivers) and then installed Coolbits to overclock the card.
I did a base run with 3dMark2001 with the new drivers set at the default clock speeds (250 mhz core clock and 513 mhz ram speed) and came up with a pretty nice base run.
Then.. I overclocked the card to 300 mhz core clock (previous owner said it would do 300 mhz no problem) and bumped the ram by 20 to around 530 mhz. I ran 3dMark2001 again and only picked up 50 points.
Since my gains were so pathetic (probably my system limiting this), I decided to move the clock settings back to stock because it wasn't worth pushing the card for such a measly gain.
Now.. Here's my question. After I moved the clock speeds back to stock and ran 3dmark2001 again, my scores are 100-200 less than what they were initially with the fresh drivers and the card at stock clock speeds. I tried running the test at different times and even let my system cool overnight and ran it again when the card was nice and cool.
Why would my 3dMark2001 scores be lower now than what they were before I overclocked? The card was overclocked by the previous owner. I only had the card overclocked to run 3dMark once and the card was fine. It didn't get hot. I didn't get any kind of artifacts.
Any ideas?
TIA,
Sal