• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Question about inverse laplace transform

Status
Not open for further replies.
?? Plain as day - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_residue_theorem

Heh. 😉

It doesn't seem that tricky, residue theorem just gives you a simple, predictable expression to sum residues if you know certain things about your curve (e.g. that it is rectifiable). Where is the disconnect for you?

what the residues actually mean/do.

i dont understand residues so well but I can see how if you treat your frequency components as vectors and map them onto a sphere, you can essentially treat the integral as a line integral and use stokes theorem to solve. stokes theorem somehow becomes residues. a derivation or intuitive interpretation would help a lot 🙂
 
Last edited:
I'm only somewhat versed in this (a couple comm systems/dsp style 4000/8000 level EE classes), but AFAIK the whole thing about residues is they are an easy way to calculate analytic (holomorphic) functions and they make finding the contour integral easier, when the analytic function has singularities. I have never personally seen an application of this, but if you have something in mind maybe post that and I could give explaining the process a shot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top