- Aug 24, 2005
- 6,783
- 27
- 91
Prompted by a question in a recent interview I had, I was thinking about dynamic power consumption in CMOS. I know the formula well, as it relates to the charging and discharging cycle of the load capacitance. P=afCV^2
However, my question has become where is the power actually dissipated? Rabaey et al. mentions it is dissipated in the NMOS and PMOS which are turned on to charge/discharge the capacitance. There are short derivations which demonstrates that the power consumed is independent of the resistance of that NMOS or PMOS, which involves energy calculations when you charge an RC circuit with a step function. Something seems strange to me though. Lets say I replace the PMOS and NMOS with a similar devices except they have superconducting behavior with a R_on of truly 0 Ohms. Where is the power being dissipated now? The RC constant is now 0, which breaks most of the math involved in the most cited derivations of power consumption and capacitor charging because basic circuit theory says dv/dt must be finite across the capacitor. I must be missing something very fundamental here.
I'm also assuming an ideal load capacitance with 0 real impedance, which in reality would be non-zero. In which case I propose the same question with a hypothetical circuit where all material is superconducting so there is 0 resistance at all points.
Although I can follow the equations which yield this result with a finite R, it seems fundamentally strange that a capacitor only stores half the energy that was used to charge it. It seems I had forgotten this idea since basic circuit theory.
The best explanation I've found isn't even in any of my circuit textbooks, it's on hyperphysics:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/capeng2.html#c4
"Though it will not be shown here, if you proceed further with this problem by making the charging resistance so small that the initial charging current is extremely high, a sizable fraction of the charging energy is actually radiated away as electromagnetic energy. This crosses the threshold into antenna theory because not all the loss in charging was thermodynamic - but still the loss in the process was half the energy supplied by the battery in charging the capacitor."
Given I haven't studied more than basic EM theory, maybe someone could direct me to some further explanation of this phenomena? Any organic explanations would also be appreciated.
However, my question has become where is the power actually dissipated? Rabaey et al. mentions it is dissipated in the NMOS and PMOS which are turned on to charge/discharge the capacitance. There are short derivations which demonstrates that the power consumed is independent of the resistance of that NMOS or PMOS, which involves energy calculations when you charge an RC circuit with a step function. Something seems strange to me though. Lets say I replace the PMOS and NMOS with a similar devices except they have superconducting behavior with a R_on of truly 0 Ohms. Where is the power being dissipated now? The RC constant is now 0, which breaks most of the math involved in the most cited derivations of power consumption and capacitor charging because basic circuit theory says dv/dt must be finite across the capacitor. I must be missing something very fundamental here.
I'm also assuming an ideal load capacitance with 0 real impedance, which in reality would be non-zero. In which case I propose the same question with a hypothetical circuit where all material is superconducting so there is 0 resistance at all points.
Although I can follow the equations which yield this result with a finite R, it seems fundamentally strange that a capacitor only stores half the energy that was used to charge it. It seems I had forgotten this idea since basic circuit theory.
The best explanation I've found isn't even in any of my circuit textbooks, it's on hyperphysics:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/capeng2.html#c4
"Though it will not be shown here, if you proceed further with this problem by making the charging resistance so small that the initial charging current is extremely high, a sizable fraction of the charging energy is actually radiated away as electromagnetic energy. This crosses the threshold into antenna theory because not all the loss in charging was thermodynamic - but still the loss in the process was half the energy supplied by the battery in charging the capacitor."
Given I haven't studied more than basic EM theory, maybe someone could direct me to some further explanation of this phenomena? Any organic explanations would also be appreciated.
Last edited: