Originally posted by: cyberfish
which is a newer 1 Gb IC designed for default speeds of DDR2-1066 7-7-7 1.8V
Then why is Crucial labelling them as DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 2.2V? Sounds like it should do 1.8V at that speed? It actually made me hesitant before I bought it, thinking the high voltage would limit my OC. The OCZ Gold is rated at 1.8V.
Marketing.
Very few enthusiasts, nevermind the average user, understand RAM at all.
I barely know the basics, but knowing the basics makes understanding things a lot easier.
If you try to sell DDR2-1066 7-7-7 1.8v, you get people posting "LOL CAS 7 that's so bad :roll:", since they don't realize their own DDR2-800 is actually DDR2-667 5-5-5 1.8v.
They won't understand just because RAM is labeled one speed, timings, & voltage doesn't mean it cannot run a much higher speed, tighter timings, lower voltage, etc.
Also, while some dimms may do DDR2-1000 5-5-5 1.8v like yours, others may not, so it will depend on how rigorously the manufacturer is binning their stuff.
You can see some RAM barely able to do its rated speed, & then the same stuff overclocking far higher.
Obviously, results tend to be similar if using the same IC, but again, binning [or lack thereof] will affect what results we get.
As for the Crucial's epic fail with so much of their DDR2 lately, it's hard to say for sure why.
I believe part of it is due to Micron, which really doesn't do well longterm with the voltage often used (2.1v & higher).
Maybe poorer QC on their part, who knows.
I will admit i wouldn't likely be buying Crucial 2x1 GB kits myself due to the high numbers of issues reported, but as can be seen, not all are bad of course.