• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Quality of CD-R media these days?

jrichrds

Platinum Member
4 years back, CD-R discs using pthalocyanine (messed up the spelling) dye was considered premium. Now, all the "cheap" discs use this dye and can burn at 32x and up.

Has cd-r media technology improved to a point where even CMC Magnetics, Princo, and Ritek are making CD-Rs of an acceptably high quality?
(assuming the repackager puts a decent coating on top, such as Imation with CMC Magnetics discs)
 
I buy generic CDR media and can burn them full speed on my 32x LiteOn with no problems what so ever...

Now, DVD-R/RW media is another story...
 
Technically, yes, pretty much any CD-R media is reliable and mostly dependable. However, I for one still find it worth the money to burn important data onto TY CD-Rs, as they have proved over the long run to be #1.
 
What was the data on how long these discs last? Wasn't it more dependent on the dye being used? (cyanine = 25 years, phthalocyanine = 100 years or something like that).
I have a lot of the older Taiyo Yuden and Kodak Gold discs with the cyanine dye, but am guessing the newer Imation/CMC Magnetics discs using phthalocyanine are now more reliable than those.
 
What was the data on how long these discs last? Wasn't it more dependent on the dye being used? (cyanine = 25 years, phthalocyanine = 100 years or something like that).

Does anybody have any links to longevity tests for the different types of dyes?
 
I have "4x" blank discs from many years ago that burn at 32x no prob, and 16x discs from a year ago that top out at its rated speed.

I did ask about longevity, but in the end, given the rate of progress in storage technology, I guess it doesn't really matter if the disc lasts 25 years or 100 years. I doubt people will still be relying on CDs for long-term storage in 20 years.

More worrisome is premature failure due to poor disc design. I have heard of discs flaking, which I assume are discs with a very weak topcoat. I'm guessing the silkscreened discs from the major name brands such as TDK and Imation won't have such issues.
 
Back
Top