Question Qualcomm's first Nuvia based SoC - Hamoa

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

NTMBK

Lifer
Nov 14, 2011
10,232
5,012
136
There's been some interesting rumors on the Korean forums, supposedly (take it as a grain of salt):

2024 8g3 will be N4P and still Cortex cores
2025 8g4 will N3E and Nuvia Oryon CPU. Supposedly 2x Phoenix-I cores + 6x Phoenix-M cores

2024 Exynos 2400 will be 1x X4 + 2x A720 + 3x A720 + 4x A520
2025 Exynos 2500 will be 1x X5 + 3x X5 + 2x A730 + 4x A520 with an interesting big+mid+little+tiny config (big X5 at 3.2~3.3GHz and mid X5 cores 2.3~2.5GHz)

Another two years until we see Nuvia cores? Urgh.
 

FlameTail

Platinum Member
Dec 15, 2021
2,210
1,201
106

Should we make a new thread? It seems the leaks are gonna keep coming now.
 

poke01

Senior member
Mar 8, 2022
723
697
106

Should we make a new thread? It seems the leaks are gonna keep coming now.
This is one is fine until Qualcomm releases their chips to the public.
 

soresu

Platinum Member
Dec 19, 2014
2,654
1,857
136
I'm just going to laugh until my throat lining is gone if it turns out that Sophia Antipolis cranked out a CPU core competitive with Oryon for Cortex X4/Hunter-ELP.

To fail once with Kryo was bad enough, to fail twice would just be the stuff of legends.

Given ARM Ltd's performance of late I doubt that this will be the case, but there's always a possibility of surprise 😅
 

beginner99

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2009
5,210
1,580
136
I'm just going to laugh until my throat lining is gone if it turns out that Sophia Antipolis cranked out a CPU core competitive with Oryon for Cortex X4/Hunter-ELP.

To fail once with Kryo was bad enough, to fail twice would just be the stuff of legends.

Given ARM Ltd's performance of late I doubt that this will be the case, but there's always a possibility of surprise 😅

Just a matter of time to market. when they bought nuvia it might have looked great but then as usually in big corps things take much longer than they should and the competition can catch up.
 

FlameTail

Platinum Member
Dec 15, 2021
2,210
1,201
106
I'm just going to laugh until my throat lining is gone if it turns out that Sophia Antipolis cranked out a CPU core competitive with Oryon for Cortex X4/Hunter-ELP.

To fail once with Kryo was bad enough, to fail twice would just be the stuff of legends.

Given ARM Ltd's performance of late I doubt that this will be the case, but there's always a possibility of surprise 😅

Is Sophia-Antipolis so great? The way you (and almost everyone else) speaks makes them look legendary.
 

soresu

Platinum Member
Dec 19, 2014
2,654
1,857
136
Is Sophia-Antipolis so great? The way you (and almost everyone else) speaks makes them look legendary.
They designed Cortex A9, A12/A17, A73 and A75 - all very efficient and performant cores.

By comparison the Austin design team have a tendency to go big and sometimes over do it a bit pushing performance leading to cores that are not so great efficiency wise in their first node target.

I wouldn't call the Sophia-Antipolis design team great, but what they managed with more constrained compute resources on A75 was pretty impressive.

Supposedly the A720/Hunter and X4/Hunter-ELP cores are ground up designs with a greater performance target in mind since shortly after the SoftBank acquisition when they started having greater R&D capital for designing several larger cores in parallel to become competitive with the higher end (aka Apple).

Whether the SA team can meet that target is certainly an interesting question.

From what I was told a couple of years ago the A710/X2 generation codenamed Matterhorn was supposd to be this new SA ground up design.

Instead we got a further evolution of Austin's A76 continuity (A76 was their last truly ground up design) - and A715/X3 is another Austin evolution.

At this point I have to admit I'm well past anxious that something has gone horribly wrong forcing a complete restart.
 

Roland00Address

Platinum Member
Dec 17, 2008
2,196
260
126

The tablets mostly using 4P+4E CPU which are targeting upcoming iPad Pro with M3...where is x86 ULV CPU ?;):p

Intel has some 15w chips that can do 12w ctdp down, (which is now called MAP), 2+4 and 2+8 and since the e cores can flucate at 900 mhz to 3.3 ghz with Skylake performance and has those 4.5 to 5.0 ghz performance cores well it is interesting. What is curious is the price and the power consumption for such a chip.
 

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
649
535
106

Hmm, the specs look interesting especially compared to M2 Pro series. Guess Qualcomm would be the second PC SoC maker to design SoC with 256-bit memory interfaces. AMD should be following next year.....Intel might have one coming as well. Below is comparison chart between 8cx Gen 4 and M2/3 series:

M2M38cx Gen 4M2 ProM3 Pro8cx Gen 4 Pro?
NodeN5PN3BN4PN5PN3BN4P
Die Size141.7 mm2?~250 mm2?
Transistors20 billions?40 billions?
CPU cores4P+4E4P+4E8P+4E8P+4E
L2 Cache (P cores)16 MB12 MB32 MB24 MB
L2 Cache (E cores)4 MB8 MB?8 MB4 MB8 MB?8 MB
L3 SLC Cache8 MB12 MB?6 MB?24 MB12 MB
Max Memory24 GB32 GB32 GB32 GB64 GB64 GB
Memory Interfaces128-bit LPDDR5128-bit LPDDR5X128-bit LPDDR5X256bit LPDDR5256-bit LPDDR5X256-bit LPDDR5X
Memory BW100 GB/s136 GB/s136 GB/s200 GB/s272 GB/s272 GB/s
GPU10 cores12 cores??19 cores24 cores?4 MB
ALU128015361536243230723072 ?
AIE (TOPS)15.8> 2022.5 ?15.8> 4045
 
Last edited:

Doug S

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2020
2,248
3,479
136
Hmm, the specs look interesting especially compared to M2 Pro series. Guess Qualcomm would be the second PC SoC maker to design SoC with 256-bit memory interfaces. AMD should be following next year.....Intel might have one coming as well. Below is comparison chart between 8cx Gen and M2 series:

Except Apple will be on M3 built on N3 in 2024 when this makes its appearance, so comparisons to M2 aren't that relevant.

Anyway, while everyone will want to compare it to Apple's offerings it will have very little effect on Apple's sales. To the extent Qualcomm is successful in the PC market it will be taking market share from Intel & AMD.
 

SpudLobby

Senior member
May 18, 2022
552
341
96

Hmm, the specs look interesting especially compared to M2 Pro series. Guess Qualcomm would be the second PC SoC maker to design SoC with 256-bit memory interfaces. AMD should be following next year.....Intel might have one coming as well. Below is comparison chart between 8cx Gen and M2 series:

M28cx Gen 4M2 Pro8cx Gen 4 Pro?
NodeN5PN4PN5PN4P
Die Size141.7 mm2?~250 mm2?
Transistors20 billions?40 billions?
CPU cores4P+4E4P+4E8P+4E8P+4E
L2 Cache (P cores)16 MB12 MB32 MB24 MB
L2 Cache (E cores)4 MB8 MB4 MB8 MB
L3 SLC Cache8 MB6 MB?24 MB12 MB
Max Memory24 GB32 GB32 GB64 GB
Memory Interfaces128-bit LPDDR5128-bit LPDDR5X256bit LPDDR5256-bit LPDDR5X
Memory BW100 GB/s136 GB/s200 GB/s272 GB/s
GPU10 cores?19 cores4 MB
ALU1280153624323072 ?
Where did you see these 8cx Gen 4 variant specs? Not sure I’ve seen anything specific on the variants, like the bus width especially.
 

beginner99

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2009
5,210
1,580
136

Amusing drama.
And sad because we know it will end in a wasted effort already now. Why in the world would I choose a non x86 for Windows if it isn't a lot cheaper? Given the description it will likley cost a lot more than budget intel based systems. So yeah, no thanks. And I doubt Qualcomm will provide a similar tool to apples x86 transpiler or even if much less efficient. So buying such a windows system just is asking for heachaches over headaches.
 

moinmoin

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2017
4,944
7,656
136