- Apr 17, 2006
- 31
- 0
- 0
I'm trying to help a friend put a workstation together and I'm wondering, besides the price, is there any advantage in having a quad core over 2 dual cores or vice versa? I've been trying to decide whether or not 2 dual core 5140 xeons or 2 e6600's are somehow better at batch rendering than a single quad core q6600.
I'm leaning towards the quad core since they have 8mb of L2 cache. But, I hear there are some compatibility issues and cooling problems?
Thanks!
I'm leaning towards the quad core since they have 8mb of L2 cache. But, I hear there are some compatibility issues and cooling problems?
Thanks!