I know RIM-bashing is popular but FFS can this site not maintain some level of objectivity and do a proper review of one of their devices? They are still much more popular than the WP8 stuff that AT has been knotting their panties over.
Popular among
a) The broke / shall we say those of a low-income ethnic nature who got BB because of the free BBM and because RIM were almost literally giving their low-end models away
b) The >40somethings who have it as a work phone because they can't get the hang of an iPhone (or indeed, WP).
There's definitely a market but with the positioning of the Q, perhaps market a) is out and b) will sustain them only for a while until their retire (best case).
I know that a) still has problems with Android with regard to the poor end-user experience among the lower-end Android handsets, but Apple + carriers offers superceded handsets for low subsidised prices as well in many markets and pre-BB10 users who aren't approaching retirement are moving to them or Androids.
WP brought fresh thinking and a fresh focused approach to design in UX's from a
manufacturer (iOS itself didn't bring anything new in that respect: it was the mechanics of the interaction that was new) instead of the low-rent iOS that Android still is to a large degree - it therefore deserves 'knotting panties over' IMO.
I don't actually mind the everyday interaction of BB10 and there's a lot to like, but I can't shake off the feeling of 'if Microsoft's potentially fatally late to the ball (and it is), then what is RIM?'