• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Putin Bots are out again

Fanatical Meat

Fanatical Meat

Lifer
Does anyone really believe that 75% of cnn.com readers don't think President Trump should be investigated for obstruction of justice?

as of 9:10 am Eastern results were 1.2 million votes cast
25.4% Yes
74.6% No

Edit: as of 5:30 eastern time results are:
35% Yes
65% No
*above figures are rounded to closest whole number
Edit #2: as of 9:20 eastern time results are:
29.8% Yes
70.2% No

edit: link to poll, admittedly its a "partner" poll

http://www.cnn.com/partners/ios/pages/poll/6_15_survey.html
 
Last edited:
No reason to assume it was Russian bots. The right is very good at seeding online polls. They've been doing it for ages. For example, after a political debate, if you go to one of their websites, say conservative tree house, you may find an announcement with links to all online polls for the debate, encouraging their readers to go vote in all of them. It's a coordinated effort. Not sure why this seems to only happen on the right, but apparently that is the case since there is often a huge disparity between scientific polls and online polls, and the disparity always favors the right in the online polls.
 
woolfe9998 said:
No reason to assume it was Russian bots. The right is very good at seeding online polls. They've been doing it for ages. For example, after a political debate, if you go to one of their websites, say conservative tree house, you may find an announcement with links to all online polls for the debate, encouraging their readers to go vote in all of them. It's a coordinated effort. Not sure why this seems to only happen on the right, but apparently that is the case since there is often a huge disparity between scientific polls and online polls, and the disparity always favors the right in the online polls.
Click to expand...

Ron Paul! Ron Paul! Ron Paul!
 
Did Putin help elect Trump to restore $500 billion Exxon oil deal killed by sanctions https://thinkprogress.org/putin-helped-trump-exxon-oil-deal-sanctions-6f169c4a4cd0
A deal current secretary of state and Exxon veteran Rex Tillerson was behind in 2014 BTW!!

FROM JANUARY 8... Trump already killed Paris climate deal and has just been putting it out there about ending the Russian sanctions.
UIWTwLL.jpg


I'm sure it's all a coincidence. Rex Tillerson being a great friend of Putin's is nothing.


THERE'S A WITCH HUNT GOING ON....:astonished:
 
JOTVid said:
Did Putin help elect Trump to restore $500 billion Exxon oil deal killed by sanctions https://thinkprogress.org/putin-helped-trump-exxon-oil-deal-sanctions-6f169c4a4cd0
A deal current secretary of state and Exxon veteran Rex Tillerson was behind in 2014 BTW!!

FROM JANUARY 8... Trump already killed Paris climate deal and has just been putting it out there about ending the Russian sanctions.
UIWTwLL.jpg


I'm sure it's all a coincidence. Rex Tillerson being a great friend of Putin's is nothing.


THERE'S A WITCH HUNT GOING ON....:astonished:
Click to expand...

Lol

DAG NABBIT! AND THE ONLY THING OF ANY REAL SIGNIFICANCE Y'ALL DUMB DUMMIES!
 
thraashman said:
I would absolutely tell you to lay off the drugs, but honestly I think you need more drugs. Antipsychotics to be specific. Or any that tell you that youtube links are not a valid replacement for making a sensible post.
Click to expand...

Oh, go back to your russian conspiracy theories while apologizing for islam will you. You don't get to ask for things when your ideology lost its grip on reality long ago.
 
0roo0roo said:
Oh, go back to your russian conspiracy theories while apologizing for islam will you. You don't get to ask for things when your ideology lost its grip on reality long ago.
Click to expand...
I would try to interact with you on your own level, but I simply am unable to communicate in crazy.
 
0roo0roo said:
Oh, go back to your russian conspiracy theories while apologizing for islam will you. You don't get to ask for things when your ideology lost its grip on reality long ago.
Click to expand...
that'll show 'em. post another youtube vid. Never cop to the fact you're incapable of articulating your own response. Nope, another youtube vid will do the trick, this time it will really work.
 
buckshot24 said:
And the left keeps pumping up Putin's powers to near omnipotence.
Click to expand...

Ignoring the Omnipotent Putin, even you have to think this is suspicious. Be serious please, do you honestly think two thirds to three quarters of CNN readers think President Trump should not be investigated for obstruction of justice?
I'm not talking Fox or Breibert, CNN only.

Important over 2.6 million votes have been cast
 
Fanatical Meat said:
Ignoring the Omnipotent Putin, even you have to think this is suspicious. Be serious please, do you honestly think two thirds to three quarters of CNN readers think President Trump should not be investigated for obstruction of justice?
I'm not talking Fox or Breibert, CNN only.

Important over 2.6 million votes have been cast
Click to expand...
I'm suspicious of all online polls so yes. But I wouldn't be all that surprised if it was a significant number who thinks this obstruction stuff is weak.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top