-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Pumas: Red or Blue? Read my thread, its really much better than the title suggests! U kno u want to
- Thread starter RichieZ
- Start date
Confused
Elite Member
Who says ads have to be directly relevent/linked to the product they're advertising in any way.
It's an image that you see, and will quite possibly remember, and when you remember the image, you'll associate Puma with it.
It's advertising, that's how it works, subliminal messages, it's subtle. That's the best form of advertising, something that will stick in your head.
I bet in a week you'll still remember those pictures, and that it was for Puma, whereas you'll not remember some other ads you've seen!
Confused
L
Lola
WOW! and i thought the Gucci ad was racey...this is just wrong
L
Lola
You know...i just dont know. I dont know what turns me off looking at that. I guess i may have something to do with degrating women...i dont know. its weird because when i looked at that, i was pretty shocked. I guess 'wrong' is not the right word. I guess sex does sell
Please, degrading to women? You don't hear men bitching about how ads for tools or sports are degrading to us because it makes us seem like simple minded idiots. When it comes to women, sex sells. When it comes to men, ego sells.
I'm sure if this had been an ad that implied a man was engaging in oral relations on a woman, all the woman would be saying 'it's about damn time!' or something along those lines. Go back to drinking your evian.
-silver
this is degrading to women? Ok, I agree
but what Isn't degrading anymore? I mean COME ON, really.
Gucci- degrading
Victorias Secret- degrading
any panty hose commercial or ad- degrading
seriously, women are always portrayed as objects, objecting to this would mean you have to object to every other single ad with a woman on it (practically)
unless you just take degrees.. she is "less" of an object, or this ad isnt quite as degrading... etc etc
but what Isn't degrading anymore? I mean COME ON, really.
Gucci- degrading
Victorias Secret- degrading
any panty hose commercial or ad- degrading
seriously, women are always portrayed as objects, objecting to this would mean you have to object to every other single ad with a woman on it (practically)
unless you just take degrees.. she is "less" of an object, or this ad isnt quite as degrading... etc etc
L
Lola
Whoa! calm down. No, i am not one of "those women" . If you read my post i said i was
not sure as to why i was taken back by those ads. I have no problem with sex at all, and am quite open about it... i was just a bit surprised to see that, if in fact it is a real ad. I guess i should heed my own advise and have an open mind
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
