Public study detailed nuke reactors' vulnerabilities

jehh

Banned
Jan 16, 2001
3,576
0
0
Our government isn't involved in some grand conspiracy to cover stuff up, they are not a bunch of X-Files kinda people...

They are just too incompetent to do so, and this is just yet more proof...

"A study that could serve as a veritable how-to guide for terrorists interested in waging a nuclear attack on the U.S. was available to the public until a few hours ago."

As Homer would say, "Doh!"

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,37157,00.html

Jason
 

RDMustang1

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2001
4,139
0
76
This is just a lie, they are telling this to bin Laden to get him to try to take one over, but in reality they have hundreds of secret agents guarding it and are just waiting to capture more terrorists ;)
 

iamwiz82

Lifer
Jan 10, 2001
30,772
13
81
wow, thank you Fox News for telling everyone in the world what few people knew!
 

slipperyslope

Banned
Oct 10, 1999
1,622
0
0
Well considering I live near one, they first reaction I had after things started to sink in about WTC was the fact that nuclear reactor here could end up being a target. It is close enough to atlanta that it would probably take out atlanta and most of the upstate of SC if it were to get destroyed.

Jim
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
I worked at the second largest operating one in the country here in New Jersey. It is the one owned by PSE&G, Salem/Hope Creek Nuclear Plant. I worked for security, so I have much knowlegde about nuclear power plants and the security. I worked there for 5 years. First off most Nulclear plants where you see those big Towers with steam coming out of them, they are called cooling towers. That is the design of Hope Creek. Three Mile Island is the same. They are virtually useless to attack. The reactors are deep underground for both. Salem is a little different. The cooling system and reactor are are contained inside a ball. Trust me when I say this, no plane is going to penetrate those balls. They are more than 20 feet thick reinforced concrete and steel. They were designed to withstand a missle blast. But they were designed 20 years ago. Outside of flying in it would be almost impossible of breaking the perimeter without being found out. Any breach, the reactor places and critical areas will be protected and shutdown if necessary. The entire perimeters are protected by microwave alarms. The gap between the inner fence and outer fence is too large to pole vault over. All of the critical places are protected by huge steel doors. Most are deep under ground. The control centers where the operators are, are enclosed in thick glass and steel. Outside of a grenade or small rocket launcher you can forget getting in. There are armed guards on site. Nothing gets in or out. Every vehicle is checked inside, outside, and even under. The detectors where people enter detect metal and chemicals for explosives. The xray machines are powerful enough to literrally look through a human body. It would have to be an inside job. And the only way is to get the reactors to over heat. But they are programmed to shut down regardless if anything goes astray. Trust me the Nuclear Plants are like fortresses. And even for an inside job, it would have to be more sophicated than the airplanes. Many floors and places where some damage could be done are just not accessible. There are many many guards on site. Just to work there you'll go through a background check like the the FBI. It would be extremely difficult to attack a Nuke plant. Just so many layers of security. But I will say this if by some stroke of genius some one did blow up, just bend over and say goodbye. The Nuke plants here are generating far more power than the one is Russia that leaked. But they are without question one of the most safest places against terrorism or public harm. Hell the danger with them is those elctromagnetic waves from the power lines leaving the Nuke plant. My knowlegde is limited to that of here in NJ, but the NRC makes sure that all Nuke plants operate under very strict guidelines. I mean very strict guidelines.
 

rahvin

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,475
1
0
Classy, I'm shocked! You said something intelligent that I agreed with. ;)

For those of you that are familiar with steel measurements, all the steel in a reactor core containment vessel is #18, and as classy said they are typically 20' thick. They are designed to contain an overheating nuclear reaction, a 747 hitting them is like a fly landing on a bowling ball.

This is the reason people fear breeder reactors, they don't have the containment vessle.