LOL, love it.
"if you are going to spend money, make sure you have enough funds to cover the costs of your purchases."
we're a wise group.
What cracks me up about the constant stream of complainers who got hit with overdraft fees is that nobody decides to just carry cash and spend that. No more cash = no more buying = no overdraft fees. It's pretty self-enforcing, requires no fancy bank agreements, and I don't have to go online to know how much money I have.
But nobody seems to consider that as an option any more.
Incorrect. In fact, I don't even use banks. Period. I've been cash only for about 4 or 5 years now, and 95% cash only for close to 10.
You are correct that it solves the issues. Best decision I ever made.
What cracks me up about the constant stream of complainers who got hit with overdraft fees is that nobody decides to just carry cash and spend that. No more cash = no more buying = no overdraft fees. It's pretty self-enforcing, requires no fancy bank agreements, and I don't have to go online to know how much money I have.
But nobody seems to consider that as an option any more.
What cracks me up about the constant stream of complainers who got hit with overdraft fees is that nobody decides to just carry cash and spend that. No more cash = no more buying = no overdraft fees. It's pretty self-enforcing, requires no fancy bank agreements, and I don't have to go online to know how much money I have.
But nobody seems to consider that as an option any more.
What cracks me up about the constant stream of complainers who got hit with overdraft fees is that nobody decides to just carry cash and spend that. No more cash = no more buying = no overdraft fees. It's pretty self-enforcing, requires no fancy bank agreements, and I don't have to go online to know how much money I have.
But nobody seems to consider that as an option any more.
If you don't have two months expenses in your checking account you're doing it wrong.
Over the years I've come to conclude that many, many people are not responsible enough to have a bank account and should be dealing only in cash. You're right though, people don't consider this. If they would simply keep a balance sheet they would be fine, but that requires work and thinking, two things a lot of people have an aversion to.
checking? savings account maybe, but checking?
checking? savings account maybe, but checking?
checking? savings account maybe, but checking?
People don't even know how to balance a checkbook. That's why you see young people with a complete lack of any money skills. That basic skill needs to be taught in school or at the very least by their parents and rigorously pounded into their skull until they understand it.
Or, the bank could just decline your $3.49 purchase instead of allowing it to go through and then charging you a $35 overdraft fee. You should at least have this option, but as far as I know with most banks you don't.
They don't teach kids a lot of things sadly. My wife deals with kids all the time that want mortgages, they just expect the bank to give them a loan on the merit of what they are (or who they think they are). Forget the fact they have overdrawn their accounts 10 times in the last 12 months or have 30-40k in unsecured credit card debt, their view is the bank owes them a loan, just because.
If you don't have two months expenses in your checking account you're doing it wrong.
95% of humans are doing it wrong i guess.