Originally posted by: eakers
why not?
Originally posted by: alien42
this post is definately not a bad boy
Originally posted by: Cutterhead
I prefer "Bad Jascksons" anyway. As in "hook me up with one a them Bad Jacksons." Much more acceptable nomenclature.
Originally posted by: daveymark
Originally posted by: eakers
why not?
I don't explain the rules, I just post them
Originally posted by: ShadowBlade
no
and just to spite you, i will now start reffering to inanimate objects as "sexy things," "hot sons of bitches," and "people"
Originally posted by: daveymark
Originally posted by: ShadowBlade
no
and just to spite you, i will now start reffering to inanimate objects as "sexy things," "hot sons of bitches," and "people"
that's fine. just not "bad boys"
if you really wanted to spite me, you'd eat vanilla pudding.
Originally posted by: ShadowBlade
Originally posted by: daveymark
Originally posted by: ShadowBlade
no
and just to spite you, i will now start reffering to inanimate objects as "sexy things," "hot sons of bitches," and "people"
that's fine. just not "bad boys"
if you really wanted to spite me, you'd eat vanilla pudding.
vanilla pudding kicks ass, and thats not just to spite you
Originally posted by: joedrake
I call them puppers.. like "oo lemme see that pupper"