PSA - THE Gimp 2.2 for Windows now ROCKS!

episodic

Lifer
Feb 7, 2004
11,088
2
81
If you've tried the gimp before - time to try it again. IMHO it is almost as good as photoshop now. . .
 

LeetViet

Platinum Member
Mar 6, 2003
2,411
0
76
That's what I was told a couple of years ago. :p

Edit: Ahahaha look at the Mac screenshot for Gimp, I see an Adobe Photoshop icon! :D
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Interesting... I'm running 2.0 right now, I find the differences between it and Photoshop to be annoying because I'm so used to how Photoshop works. I'll give this a try though.
 

Jzero

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
18,834
1
0
I'd hazard that what The Gimp lacks of Photoshop, 90% of casual users will rarely/never need anyway. And you don't even have to steal it or shell out hundreds of dollars. What are you waiting for?! :)
 

quikah

Diamond Member
Apr 7, 2003
4,198
743
126
The Gimp is WAY to much program for the casual user, and the interface is confusing as hell. Same with Photoshop. These programs are great for professional/amateur graphic artists, but overkill for the average person who is just trying to crop his christmas party photos. I would stear the majority of Windows people to the also free paint.net http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/paint.net/.

 

igowerf

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2000
7,697
1
76
Originally posted by: quikah
The Gimp is WAY to much program for the casual user, and the interface is confusing as hell. Same with Photoshop. These programs are great for professional/amateur graphic artists, but overkill for the average person who is just trying to crop his christmas party photos. I would stear the majority of Windows people to the also free paint.net http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/paint.net/.

Wow. Paint.net looks great! It even supports layers! Thanks. I've added it to the freeware thread at the top of this forum.
 

episodic

Lifer
Feb 7, 2004
11,088
2
81
Originally posted by: igowerf
Originally posted by: quikah
The Gimp is WAY to much program for the casual user, and the interface is confusing as hell. Same with Photoshop. These programs are great for professional/amateur graphic artists, but overkill for the average person who is just trying to crop his christmas party photos. I would stear the majority of Windows people to the also free paint.net http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/paint.net/.

Wow. Paint.net looks great! It even supports layers! Thanks. I've added it to the freeware thread at the top of this forum.

Looks good for a total newbie. Not a good selection of tools, etc. Looking forward to version 6 or 7 :)
 

igowerf

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2000
7,697
1
76
Originally posted by: episodic
Originally posted by: igowerf
Originally posted by: quikah
The Gimp is WAY to much program for the casual user, and the interface is confusing as hell. Same with Photoshop. These programs are great for professional/amateur graphic artists, but overkill for the average person who is just trying to crop his christmas party photos. I would stear the majority of Windows people to the also free paint.net http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/paint.net/.

Wow. Paint.net looks great! It even supports layers! Thanks. I've added it to the freeware thread at the top of this forum.

Looks good for a total newbie. Not a good selection of tools, etc. Looking forward to version 6 or 7 :)

It's better than what most people are looking for though. It might be easier to use than The GIMP since the interface is very similar to that of MS Paint. I'm still happy with my copy of Photoshop CS though. :p
 
Aug 16, 2001
22,505
4
81
Originally posted by: igowerf
Originally posted by: episodic
Originally posted by: igowerf
Originally posted by: quikah
The Gimp is WAY to much program for the casual user, and the interface is confusing as hell. Same with Photoshop. These programs are great for professional/amateur graphic artists, but overkill for the average person who is just trying to crop his christmas party photos. I would stear the majority of Windows people to the also free paint.net http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/paint.net/.

Wow. Paint.net looks great! It even supports layers! Thanks. I've added it to the freeware thread at the top of this forum.

Looks good for a total newbie. Not a good selection of tools, etc. Looking forward to version 6 or 7 :)

It's better than what most people are looking for though. It might be easier to use than The GIMP since the interface is very similar to that of MS Paint. I'm still happy with my copy of Photoshop CS though. :p

That looks great. I could never get a grip of GIMP. Very confusing interface.
:beer:
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
That looks great. I could never get a grip of GIMP. Very confusing interface.

I've never found it confusing, especially no more than any other professional image editor. 99% of the operations can be done by just right-clicking on the image and looking through the menus.
 

adlep

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2001
5,287
6
81
Originally posted by: quikah
The Gimp is WAY to much program for the casual user, and the interface is confusing as hell. Same with Photoshop. These programs are great for professional/amateur graphic artists, but overkill for the average person who is just trying to crop his christmas party photos. I would stear the majority of Windows people to the also free paint.net http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/paint.net/.

I love you
:D
THANKS A LOT FOR THIS LINK MAN
:beer:
 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
You know what, I can remember when I started in PS. It was confusing as hell, plus I was teaching myself. No doubt GIMP would be just as confusing, but I wouldn't count it against it if it were just as powerful. I use PS though since it's easy to find files and tutorials on it due to it's popularity.
 

drag

Elite Member
Jul 4, 2002
8,708
0
0
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Thanks for the heads up. I didn't realize how much work they did on the Mac version. :Q

Yep.

Looking forward to trying it out on my nice new shiny Ibook. OS 10.3.7 is nice, btw. Better then what I remember from 10.2.6. PPC port of Ubuntu is nice, too.

Gimp is looking realy nice lately, especially with it's ability to incorporate scripting with python and script-fu. Makes it nifty.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Thanks for the heads up; I was waiting for the one developer, Jernej Simoncic, to release the last of the 2.0.x versions (think it was 2.0.6), but he never did; I guess he was waiting for the completion of 2.2. I'll have to give this a shot sometime. I've found GIMP to be very useful. It's a bit quirky, and there are a few features missing from the UI that are present in most other Windows programs, like in Explorer, you can press a letter key, and it takes you to a folder starting with that letter - not in GIMP. Unless they added that in 2.2. (Edit: Nope, looks like they haven't.)


Some tooltips also have a bug - they stay on top, even when the GIMP window is in the back. And they won't go away until the program is closed.

Screenshot (GIF, 160KB)
Alternate link, zipped BMP (53KB)
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: drag
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Thanks for the heads up. I didn't realize how much work they did on the Mac version. :Q

Yep.

Looking forward to trying it out on my nice new shiny Ibook. OS 10.3.7 is nice, btw. Better then what I remember from 10.2.6. PPC port of Ubuntu is nice, too.

Gimp is looking realy nice lately, especially with it's ability to incorporate scripting with python and script-fu. Makes it nifty.

I didn't know you got an iBook. Congrats! I didn't use 10.2, I went from 10.0 to 10.1 to 10.3. :eek:
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
I use PS though since it's easy to find files and tutorials on it due to it's popularity.

Not everyone can afford to drop that much money on a single piece of software, even PS Elements is ~$100.
 

drag

Elite Member
Jul 4, 2002
8,708
0
0
Works best in Linux. It's shared libraries are usually already in use by other applications so the load up time is quicker, usually. And then you have all that dialog stuff on one virtual desktop and the image itself and the toolbar and layers on one virtual desktop.

I configure Gnome to switch back and forth between virtual destkops with the "windows" (called super key sometimes), on the left, and the menu key on the right. Then I use them to switch back and forth quickly. That way I can have quick access to all the different dialogs and such without having to juggle windows around. Also works very nicely with dual monitors because you have all the tools and dialogs on one monitor and have the image itself on your bigger nicer one. That way I just keep everything open, plus when you have dual monitors it remembers the position of all your windows when you close out the app and open it up again. (just as long as you close out all at once, instead of window by window).

Stuff like that shows you that it was designed with the Linux sort of way at looking a window handling rather the relying on the MDI single-big-window-with-many-small-internal-windows type stuff that Photoshop uses, which is a sort of hack to make Windows window handling act more closely to the Mac style of window handling... since Photoshop was originally a Mac application.

Macs open each application in their own space. With the file-option-view-etc menus at the top of the screen. Click on any section of any application and it brings the entire thing up to the top, so all the photoshop windows and dialogs stick together. The big mother window type thing that Windows uses is sort of designed to emulate that behavior.

Windows just realy isn't all that good for handling all those small interrelated windows. Makes using Gimp awkward.

It's weird. I was shocked first time I used photoshop in Windows, the thing was so ugly and weird looking. I thought I was using a ancient version, but it was newer then the ones I used to use on Macs.

Then the same thing happenned when I first tried Gimp out in Windows. It was all slow and weird to use again compared to what I used to in Linux.

the little differences between the platforms are come out in strange ways.
 

Megatomic

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
20,127
6
81
Originally posted by: adlep
Originally posted by: quikah
The Gimp is WAY to much program for the casual user, and the interface is confusing as hell. Same with Photoshop. These programs are great for professional/amateur graphic artists, but overkill for the average person who is just trying to crop his christmas party photos. I would stear the majority of Windows people to the also free paint.net http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/paint.net/.

I love you
:D
THANKS A LOT FOR THIS LINK MAN
:beer:
Yes, thanks! I am gonna give it a spin.
 

drag

Elite Member
Jul 4, 2002
8,708
0
0
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: drag
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Thanks for the heads up. I didn't realize how much work they did on the Mac version. :Q

Yep.

Looking forward to trying it out on my nice new shiny Ibook. OS 10.3.7 is nice, btw. Better then what I remember from 10.2.6. PPC port of Ubuntu is nice, too.

Gimp is looking realy nice lately, especially with it's ability to incorporate scripting with python and script-fu. Makes it nifty.

I didn't know you got an iBook. Congrats! I didn't use 10.2, I went from 10.0 to 10.1 to 10.3. :eek:

Yep. The little thing is fun to use just got it for christmas, a sort of Xmas/Birthday/College Graduation present all mixed together, plus now I owe my parents 600 dollars. :p

it's actually quite resonably priced for 12 inch ultra-portable style formfactor with a good ATI mobility video card. (ATI 9200, and it's supported by DRI, too! Hardware acceleration is immediately configured with Ubuntu + hoary X.org update.)
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
drag, why wouldn't you want to use OSX on that notebook???

Because it's OS X? If I ever got one the first thing I would do would be to install Debian as well.
 

Megatomic

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
20,127
6
81
I don't know, the few times I've played around with OSX I liked it. Let me qualify that, it's infinitely better than HP-UX. :)
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
The UI isn't terrible, but it's limiting and they hide a lot from you. And I'm already used to all of my Linux apps, last time I used X on top of OS X it just didn't feel right, but that may have changed.