- Sep 10, 2001
- 12,348
- 1
- 81
While I was at the gym today, I saw a caption stating, "McCain Aide: He's no CEO" or something to that effect. The "reporter" followed up with, "If he can't run a company, how can he run the largest economy in the world?" I know that this topic has been covered, and I'm not planning on addressing it directly. It just drives me nuts that people really think the president is in charge of the economy.
The president doesn't run the economy. The president doesn't pass budgets. The president doesn't make laws. The president doesn't pass tax cuts. The president doesn't reform Medicare. The president doesn't decide whether we get nationalized healthcare. The president is not responsible for any of these things. The role of the executive branch in domestic affairs is to enforce the laws passed by the legislature.
What's the point of this weak rant? To point out perhaps the reason things suck politically right now: people want a king rather than a republican government. You ascribe all of the powers of the legislature and executive branch to one man. WHY? Are you too intellectually lazy to look at the congressmen and senators that you get to choose from and put some of the burden on them? Or is it that it's just that much easier to lump all of the blame on one guy because it makes for a good talking point? Buck up, take some personal responsibility for the idiots you elected, and understand the role of the various branches of government. There are infinitely many things that you can validly blame Bush/whatever president for - why fabricate new ones?
The president doesn't run the economy. The president doesn't pass budgets. The president doesn't make laws. The president doesn't pass tax cuts. The president doesn't reform Medicare. The president doesn't decide whether we get nationalized healthcare. The president is not responsible for any of these things. The role of the executive branch in domestic affairs is to enforce the laws passed by the legislature.
What's the point of this weak rant? To point out perhaps the reason things suck politically right now: people want a king rather than a republican government. You ascribe all of the powers of the legislature and executive branch to one man. WHY? Are you too intellectually lazy to look at the congressmen and senators that you get to choose from and put some of the burden on them? Or is it that it's just that much easier to lump all of the blame on one guy because it makes for a good talking point? Buck up, take some personal responsibility for the idiots you elected, and understand the role of the various branches of government. There are infinitely many things that you can validly blame Bush/whatever president for - why fabricate new ones?