PSA: Resize your f'ing pics on bbzzdd.

[Balt]

Last 25 is a horror story.

I'd tell you to take a look, but if you clicked on the thumbnails it would probably shut down the intarweb.

 

[Ryan]

Meh - HQ is the best, please STFU

 

[Balt]

Originally posted by: rbloedow
Meh - HQ is the best, please STFU

meh, have some consideration for the person running the service for FREE to the at community.

get your head out of your ass, mmm-kay?

 

[Steve]

I agree. Group shots and kitties at waaay too big dimensions.

 

[Anubis]

usea different site, one that runs say coppermine and auto thumbnails all pics to like 640x480 and full size is availiable by clicking on them

 

[George P Burdell]

Originally posted by: Balt

Originally posted by: rbloedow
Meh - HQ is the best, please STFU

meh, have some consideration for the person running the service for FREE to the at community.

get your head out of your ass, mmm-kay?

how much bandwidth does pics.bbzzdd use up every day?

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Originally posted by: hotchilisauce

Originally posted by: Balt

Originally posted by: rbloedow
Meh - HQ is the best, please STFU

meh, have some consideration for the person running the service for FREE to the at community.

get your head out of your ass, mmm-kay?

how much bandwidth does pics.bbzzdd use up every day?

One metric fvckton, no more, no less.

- M4H

 

[n0cmonkey]

Originally posted by: Balt

Originally posted by: rbloedow
Meh - HQ is the best, please STFU

meh, have some consideration for the person running the service for FREE to the at community.

get your head out of your ass, mmm-kay?

They offer a free service. They limit the amount of data you can keep there (file size). They limit the content. I think following those rules is enough.

 

Originally posted by: hotchilisauce
how much bandwidth does pics.bbzzdd use up every day?

Currently 1.6GB daily. We are about to crack 1TB served. Cripes.

PS: It's modeps' blood your pics are coming from -- thank him.

 

[DurocShark]

:cheese; for your :wine:?

 

[Anubis]

Originally posted by: hotchilisauce

Originally posted by: Balt

Originally posted by: rbloedow
Meh - HQ is the best, please STFU

meh, have some consideration for the person running the service for FREE to the at community.

get your head out of your ass, mmm-kay?

how much bandwidth does pics.bbzzdd use up every day?

2,539 users / 24,504 pics / 3.71GB online
1.54GB today / 1.61GB daily / 927.28GB ever

 

[imported_Pablo]

Green pixel rules.

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: dwell

Originally posted by: hotchilisauce
how much bandwidth does pics.bbzzdd use up every day?

Currently 1.6GB daily. We are about to crack 1TB served. Cripes.

PS: It's modeps' blood your pics are coming from -- thank him.

Thanks modeps!!! :thumbsup:

 

[Xionide]

pics.bbzzdd.com

 

[Beau]

Originally posted by: Anubis
usea different site, one that runs say coppermine and auto thumbnails all pics to like 640x480 and full size is availiable by clicking on them

Or Pictars

 

[new2AMD]

check the last 25 on chronicstupor

 

[pulse8]

Originally posted by: Beau

Originally posted by: Anubis
usea different site, one that runs say coppermine and auto thumbnails all pics to like 640x480 and full size is availiable by clicking on them

Or Pictars

See sig! :|

 

[Balt]

Originally posted by: n0cmonkey

Originally posted by: Balt

Originally posted by: rbloedow
Meh - HQ is the best, please STFU

meh, have some consideration for the person running the service for FREE to the at community.

get your head out of your ass, mmm-kay?

They offer a free service. They limit the amount of data you can keep there (file size). They limit the content. I think following those rules is enough.

It might be, but then again no one really needs to see a 1600x1200 (or even larger) image of something that could just as easily be half (actually a quarter as 1600x1200 is 4 times as large as 800x600) that and still convey the same thing. How many people even run their monitors at that resolution? I don't think I'll be printing out of the pics, so it's not like I need the quality for that.

 

[T2T III]

Originally posted by: Balt
Last 25 is a horror story.

I'd tell you to take a look, but if you clicked on the thumbnails it would probably shut down the intarweb.

Al Gore would be horrified ... the thought of the Intarweb - the very same Intarweb that he created shutting down? Say it isn't so. :Q

 

[n0cmonkey]

Originally posted by: Balt

Originally posted by: n0cmonkey

Originally posted by: Balt

Originally posted by: rbloedow
Meh - HQ is the best, please STFU

meh, have some consideration for the person running the service for FREE to the at community.

get your head out of your ass, mmm-kay?

They offer a free service. They limit the amount of data you can keep there (file size). They limit the content. I think following those rules is enough.

It might be, but then again no one really needs to see a 1600x1200 (or even larger) image of something that could just as easily be half that and still convey the same thing. How many people even run their monitors at that resolution? I don't think I'll be printing out of the pics, so it's not like I need the quality for that.

If they limit the resolution, I'll resize. Until then, I don't see a point. If you don't want to see a 1600x1200 image, don't download it.

 

[T2T III]

Question regarding pictures: Is this BradRuth??

:Q :Q :Q :Q

 

[Balt]

Originally posted by: new2AMD
check the last 25 on chronicstupor

Fine examples of when high resolution is necessary.

Originally posted by: n0cmonkey

Originally posted by: Balt

Originally posted by: n0cmonkey

Originally posted by: Balt

Originally posted by: rbloedow
Meh - HQ is the best, please STFU

meh, have some consideration for the person running the service for FREE to the at community.

get your head out of your ass, mmm-kay?

They offer a free service. They limit the amount of data you can keep there (file size). They limit the content. I think following those rules is enough.

It might be, but then again no one really needs to see a 1600x1200 (or even larger) image of something that could just as easily be half that and still convey the same thing. How many people even run their monitors at that resolution? I don't think I'll be printing out of the pics, so it's not like I need the quality for that.

If they limit the resolution, I'll resize. Until then, I don't see a point. If you don't want to see a 1600x1200 image, don't download it.

Actually it makes little difference to me, but since all of them get resized anyway and I don't zoom in because I'm not interested in seeing 50% or less of the picture at one time, why waste the site's bandwidth?

Some of you are a fine example of the 'free rider' problem that exists in economics.

 

[Sluggo]

The pics of hooters girl are low res, and the stoopid kitty kat pics are high res.

WTF has become of todays yewts?

 

[RossMAN]

PSA: Get a larger monitor (at least 21" LCD) and broadband internet and STFU

 

[imported_Pablo]

Originally posted by: RossMAN
PSA: Get a larger monitor (at least 21" LCD) and broadband internet and STFU

OOOoooo. SAS-SAY