JSt0rm
Lifer
- Sep 5, 2000
- 27,399
- 3,948
- 126
I thought that was obvious and a given at this point
is being owned constantly a tiring affair or is it just your kink?
I thought that was obvious and a given at this point
Absolute immunity is not a legal defense. Trump’s entire and only defense is the partisan intent of these proceedings and he is making that case to the electorate. His supporters already buy that argument.
Here is someone elses' opinion that I agree with so I'm going to pass it off as my own insight because, this is the Internet; I can have whatever information I want and do what I want with it. Right? Right???
My prediction:
Because Dems failed to use the impeachment hearings to shift public opinion in any meaningful way, the House will impeach but it'll be close, and the Senate will acquit with a couple blue dog Senators (ex. Joe Manchin) either abstaining or voting against conviction.
Dems really need to figure out their messaging machine because the GOP is absolutely steamrolling them in this department. Any damning testimony in the hearings was usually negated by Fox/Trump spreading soundbites of Congresspeople calling the impeachment a scam, coup, etc.
Dems need to take social media lessons from AOC because it's painfully obvious she's the only one who actually understands what a fucking goldmine it is for marketing/messaging.
Sorry, not interested in a game of semanticsI noticed "nominated" Donald Trump; not "elected."
I suppose you are still in the camp of: those that didn't vote for him are to blame for his election?
Jim Jordan or some other GOP fuckhead yesterday says "we all know that all the democrats are just going to vote to impeach, this was a foregone conclusion!"
And a conservative reporter asks Pelosi if this is all just because she "hates" Trump.
Well gee, we all know that GOP will all vote against impeachment. It's a foregone conclusion. And we all know that Trump and the GOP hate the democrats. So what are we to make of all these feelings? Who's being more partisan? Or is it just a stalemate and we should just throw up our hands?
Fortunately, with both parties voting in lockstep, there is still a way to tell who is being more partisan. Look at the goddamn facts. Whichever party is voting against the grain of the evidence is probably the one who's truly being partisan.
But they want to skip that step and go right on to accusing the dems of bias. This has been their MO all along. From Strok and Paige on down. It's as if Trump being such a detestable shitbag is their best defense. See, they all hate Trump for being such a scumbag, so we want you to ignore the fact that him being such a scumbag means he actually doing scumbaggy things which causes people to hate him.
Here is someone elses' opinion that I agree with so I'm going to pass it off as my own insight because, this is the Internet; I can have whatever information I want and do what I want with it. Right? Right???
My prediction:
Because Dems failed to use the impeachment hearings to shift public opinion in any meaningful way, the House will impeach but it'll be close, and the Senate will acquit with a couple blue dog Senators (ex. Joe Manchin) either abstaining or voting against conviction.
Dems really need to figure out their messaging machine because the GOP is absolutely steamrolling them in this department. Any damning testimony in the hearings was usually negated by Fox/Trump spreading soundbites of Congresspeople calling the impeachment a scam, coup, etc.
Dems need to take social media lessons from AOC because it's painfully obvious she's the only one who actually understands what a fucking goldmine it is for marketing/messaging.
In this case, it seems to me this statement indicates you believe that, based purely on the merits of obstruction of the impeachment inquiry, Trump is guilty and should be removed from office.
Here is someone elses' opinion that I agree with so I'm going to pass it off as my own insight because, this is the Internet; I can have whatever information I want and do what I want with it. Right? Right???
My prediction:
Because Dems failed to use the impeachment hearings to shift public opinion in any meaningful way, the House will impeach but it'll be close, and the Senate will acquit with a couple blue dog Senators (ex. Joe Manchin) either abstaining or voting against conviction.
Dems really need to figure out their messaging machine because the GOP is absolutely steamrolling them in this department. Any damning testimony in the hearings was usually negated by Fox/Trump spreading soundbites of Congresspeople calling the impeachment a scam, coup, etc.
Dems need to take social media lessons from AOC because it's painfully obvious she's the only one who actually understands what a fucking goldmine it is for marketing/messaging.
Is that what they were actually doing though, practicing oversight and following elected duties? Isn't it possible they were just tired of being embarrassed by this fucking neanderthal and started down the road to impeachment?The senate will never convict. We've long passed independent thought and rational decisions. It's nothing but tribal survival now. R's have the numbers in the Senate. The end. The only consolation is that we had at least 1/2 of 1/3 of our government practicing oversight and following their elected duties to hold the President accountable.
Owned by who? You? ROFLMAO.is being owned constantly a tiring affair or is it just your kink?
You will be wildly successful, because my opinions are not myopic or binary.I wonder if I use the search function if I can't find one or more posts by you saying that Democrats are partly to blame for Republicans nominating Trump because they have been so mean to conservatives, etc. over the years. I think the odds I can are pretty good.
Is that what they were actually doing though, practicing oversight and following elected duties? Isn't it possible they were just tired of being embarrassed by this fucking neanderthal and started down the road to impeachment?
Don't forget shining a light on Trump's attempts at election meddling and making them more difficult going forward. He's made it very clear that he'll cheat in any way that he thinks he can get away with for 2020. I have to assume that that's played a factor in how quickly this has been rolling.The chances of Trump being convicted in the Senate were always near-zero. To get to 67 senators voting to remove him you're going to need about 20 Republican senators. I challenge you to come up with a list that would seem even remotely plausible.
The goal here has always been this in my opinion:
1) Do their duty to the Constitution and attempt to remove a criminal from the presidency. This was the right thing to do for America regardless of how the vote in the Senate goes.
2) Damage Republicans in moderate districts/states by forcing them to go on the record supporting Trump specifically.
3) Damage Trump for 2020 by publicly showing how he's a criminal.
I think they've done okay on those goals so far.
Owner by who? You? ROFLMAO.
If a president isn't put through the impeachment process for shaking down a foreign government that is literally at war with a country that is actively trying to undermine our democratic process for his own political gain...what is the point of even having an impeachment process?
Yup 100% on board with you there. I'm just saying, shadier things have happened both in the Obama administration, and especially in the Bush administration. Neither of which got a sniff of the impeachment process. So, I'm wondering how much of it was checks and balances, and how much of it was "This guy is a super douche, and we have a sliver of evidence, lets nail him."If a president isn't put through the impeachment process for shaking down a foreign government that is literally at war with a country that is actively trying to undermine our democratic process for his own political gain...what is the point of even having an impeachment process?
Yup 100% on board with you there. I'm just saying, shadier things have happened both in the Obama administration, and especially in the Bush administration. Neither of wish got a sniff of the impeachment process. So, I'm wondering how much of it was checks and balances, and how much of it was "This guy is a super douche, and we have a sliver of evidence, lets nail him."
Yup 100% on board with you there. I'm just saying, shadier things have happened both in the Obama administration, and especially in the Bush administration. Neither of wish got a sniff of the impeachment process. So, I'm wondering how much of it was checks and balances, and how much of it was "This guy is a super douche, and we have a sliver of evidence, lets nail him."
Shadier than manipulation of the US election process? Do tell.Yup 100% on board with you there. I'm just saying, shadier things have happened both in the Obama administration, and especially in the Bush administration. Neither of which got a sniff of the impeachment process. So, I'm wondering how much of it was checks and balances, and how much of it was "This guy is a super douche, and we have a sliver of evidence, lets nail him."
Yup 100% on board with you there. I'm just saying, shadier things have happened both in the Obama administration, and especially in the Bush administration. Neither of which got a sniff of the impeachment process. So, I'm wondering how much of it was checks and balances, and how much of it was "This guy is a super douche, and we have a sliver of evidence, lets nail him."
