It seems Turley's basic argument was, "People are angry." His schtick is that he doesn't think that what Trump did is kosher, but he doesn't think it's a crime and he certainly doesn't think it's impeachable. The country is divided, see, and we're all angry, and this is moving way too fast, so we should just drop it and move on.
If I'm angry at a judge for taking a bribe to give a criminal a joke sentence, is that an argument that the judge should or should not be removed from his job?
I'd love to have a congressperson ask him to confirm that. "If a hypothetical president asked a foreign leader to assist in his election in exchange for something...would you consider that an impeachable offense?"
Under questioning, though, he seems to be willing to agree with whatever ridiculous nonsense the Republicans throw his way, so who the fuck knows.
The vast majority of Trump fans are not going to care about professors opinions. They are indoctrinating our youth. Except maybe the professor who was not in favor of impeachment