Originally posted by: mindcycle
Originally posted by: Harvey
You're making a distinction without a difference. Bank robbery, carjacking and theft by deception or fraud all involve the theft of the property of another. Patents and copyrights recognize the value of "intellectual property" that is embodied more in concept than in a physical reality, but it is still property. If you steal the ideas of another and profit from the sale or use of those ideas, you are as much a thief as the bank robber, the con man and the carjacker.
Ok, but would you agree that physical theft and copying bytes of data are two different activities? If your answer is yes, then it would make sense that they would require different definitions.
I do NOT agree that they are two different activities. In both cases, the thief expropriates an asset that belongs to another and converting it to his own purposes, whether it's selling it or using it. It makes no difference whether it's a phyical asset or the income or reward due to the creator of intellectual property.
How do you "steal" bytes of data?
If those bytes describe or embody intellectual property, how is it NOT stealing to take them without paying the person who owns them? Patents and copyrights are provided under the U.S. Constitution.
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
Read and learn about intellectual property.
