Proof that hetero and homosexuality are genetic!

[Siva]

In fruit files

 

[Rogue]

Fruit flies....fruit....

 

[aidanjm]

intriguing

 

[shilala]

Originally posted by: Siva
In fruit files

Are fruit files where twinks store their sensitive information?

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: shilala

Originally posted by: Siva
In fruit files

Are fruit files where twinks store their sensitive information?

what does twink mean, in this context?

 

[Zysoclaplem]

This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

My belief is that heterosexual society doesn't deserve people like us in the first place. Maybe it would be for the best.

 

[pclstyle]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

will my HMO cover this

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: pclstyle

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

will my HMO cover this

Give it a few years.

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

My belief is that heterosexual society doesn't deserve people like us in the first place. Maybe it would be for the best.

So many important figures in history were homosexual. Such an impact on the world.
I think it's hard for people to realize what they have until it's gone.
Who will they put down, bash, and blame things on when we are gone? Will the world become one great big ball of harmony and happiness? If it's all genetics, and we were all created by God, what new excuses will we hear from the religious right on how such a thing could happen?

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

My belief is that heterosexual society doesn't deserve people like us in the first place. Maybe it would be for the best.

So many important figures in history were homosexual. Such an impact on the world.
I think it's hard for people to realize what they have until it's gone.
Who will they put down, bash, and blame things on when we are gone? Will the world become one great big ball of harmony and happiness? If it's all genetics, and we were all created by God, what new excuses will we hear from the religious right on how such a thing could happen?

Heterosexuals don't believe that homosexuals could have anything positive or unique to offer society. They're too used to thinking of homosexuality as a burden, disease, genetic defect, etc.

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

My belief is that heterosexual society doesn't deserve people like us in the first place. Maybe it would be for the best.

So many important figures in history were homosexual. Such an impact on the world.
I think it's hard for people to realize what they have until it's gone.
Who will they put down, bash, and blame things on when we are gone? Will the world become one great big ball of harmony and happiness? If it's all genetics, and we were all created by God, what new excuses will we hear from the religious right on how such a thing could happen?

i rather get rid of the gene that causes people to believe in religion.
:roll:

THAT would benefit the entire planet.

 

[Scarpozzi]

Gay Fruit Fies??? Now I've heard everything.

 

[Viper GTS]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

My belief is that heterosexual society doesn't deserve people like us in the first place. Maybe it would be for the best.

So many important figures in history were homosexual. Such an impact on the world.
I think it's hard for people to realize what they have until it's gone.
Who will they put down, bash, and blame things on when we are gone? Will the world become one great big ball of harmony and happiness? If it's all genetics, and we were all created by God, what new excuses will we hear from the religious right on how such a thing could happen?

Heterosexuals don't believe that homosexuals could have anything unique to offer society. They're too used to thinking of homosexuality as a burden, disease, genetic defect, etc.

We don't think you have nothing to offer, we think being gay doesn't give you anything more to offer than otherwise equivalent heterosexual. I'm sure you can rattle off all the significant gays in history, the fact remains that EVERYTHING ELSE was done by heterosexuals. Does that make the gay contributions any less important? Of course not. But with enough people doing productive things it's inevitable that some will be gay.

That is truly equal treatment.

Viper GTS

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: Viper GTS

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

My belief is that heterosexual society doesn't deserve people like us in the first place. Maybe it would be for the best.

So many important figures in history were homosexual. Such an impact on the world.
I think it's hard for people to realize what they have until it's gone.
Who will they put down, bash, and blame things on when we are gone? Will the world become one great big ball of harmony and happiness? If it's all genetics, and we were all created by God, what new excuses will we hear from the religious right on how such a thing could happen?

Heterosexuals don't believe that homosexuals could have anything unique to offer society. They're too used to thinking of homosexuality as a burden, disease, genetic defect, etc.

We don't think you have nothing to offer, we think being gay doesn't give you anything more to offer than otherwise equivalent heterosexual. I'm sure you can rattle off all the significant gays in history, the fact remains that EVERYTHING ELSE was done by heterosexuals. Does that make the gay contributions any less important? Of course not. But with enough people doing productive things it's inevitable that some will be gay.

That is truly equal treatment.

Viper GTS

My point was not to say that homosexuals are any better than anyone else. We are not. The point I was trying to make was if we start modifying the genetic makeup of the future to keep our children from being gay, what will we lose out on?
May'be nothing. May'be everything.

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: Viper GTS
We don't think you have nothing to offer, we think being gay doesn't give you anything more to offer than otherwise equivalent heterosexual.

That's like saying an introvert doesn't have anything more to offer than an extrovert. Actually, introverts and extroverts are different in some pretty fundamental ways, and hence have different things to offer. Another analogy would be to say a male doesn't have anything more to offer than a female. An equally absurd comment. If you think the only different between gays and straights is the gender they prefer to fvck, then you would be wrong.

 

[JackBurton]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

My belief is that heterosexual society doesn't deserve people like us in the first place. Maybe it would be for the best.

So many important figures in history were homosexual. Such an impact on the world.
I think it's hard for people to realize what they have until it's gone.
Who will they put down, bash, and blame things on when we are gone? Will the world become one great big ball of harmony and happiness? If it's all genetics, and we were all created by God, what new excuses will we hear from the religious right on how such a thing could happen?

i rather get rid of the gene that causes people to believe in religion.
:roll:

THAT would benefit the entire planet.

If we can ever find the "stupid" gene, that should take care of that little defect.

 

[GTaudiophile]

Originally posted by: JackBurton

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

My belief is that heterosexual society doesn't deserve people like us in the first place. Maybe it would be for the best.

So many important figures in history were homosexual. Such an impact on the world.
I think it's hard for people to realize what they have until it's gone.
Who will they put down, bash, and blame things on when we are gone? Will the world become one great big ball of harmony and happiness? If it's all genetics, and we were all created by God, what new excuses will we hear from the religious right on how such a thing could happen?

i rather get rid of the gene that causes people to believe in religion.
:roll:

THAT would benefit the entire planet.

If we can ever find the "stupid" gene, that should take care of that little defect.

There is no gene for that.

You'd have to start removing souls and human conscience.

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
My point was not to say that homosexuals are any better than anyone else. We are not.

We're not better than straight people. But we are different than straight people. Very different.

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
The point I was trying to make was if we start modifying the genetic makeup of the future to keep our children from being gay, what will we lose out on?
May'be nothing. May'be everything.

I'd predict a gradual increase in aggressiveness, war, bad clothes, poor interior design, and a decline in beautiful things, fashion, taste, co-operation, good music.

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: GTaudiophile

Originally posted by: JackBurton

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

My belief is that heterosexual society doesn't deserve people like us in the first place. Maybe it would be for the best.

So many important figures in history were homosexual. Such an impact on the world.
I think it's hard for people to realize what they have until it's gone.
Who will they put down, bash, and blame things on when we are gone? Will the world become one great big ball of harmony and happiness? If it's all genetics, and we were all created by God, what new excuses will we hear from the religious right on how such a thing could happen?

i rather get rid of the gene that causes people to believe in religion.
:roll:

THAT would benefit the entire planet.

If we can ever find the "stupid" gene, that should take care of that little defect.

There is no gene for that.

You'd have to start removing souls and human conscience.

Actually, IQ (an approximate measure of a certain form of intelligence) is very much determined by genetics. It's one of the few personality traits we know with certainty is heavily influenced by genetics. It should be possible, eventually, to determine genes which lead to stupidity versus intelligence.

 

[datalink7]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
My point was not to say that homosexuals are any better than anyone else. We are not.

We're not better than straight people. But we are different than straight people. Very different.

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
The point I was trying to make was if we start modifying the genetic makeup of the future to keep our children from being gay, what will we lose out on?
May'be nothing. May'be everything.

I'd predict a gradual increase in aggressiveness, war, bad clothes, poor interior design, and a decline in beautiful things, fashion, taste, co-operation, good music.

That's stupid. I know a gay guy who pretty much acts like a "normal" guy and hates the "gay sterotype" that you just mentioned.

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: GTaudiophile

Originally posted by: JackBurton

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
This is great news! Now we just need to find that pesky gene that causes homosexuality, so expecting parents can have it removed.
That way, the only children who might be born homosexual, are those whose parents couldn't afford to modify their childrens genetic makeup.
So homosexuality won't necessarily die out, but it will be more prevalent in low income families. Homosexuals will then truely become ostracized. None of that pansy wansy "Gay Bashing" crap. No no that just won't do anymore.
I say we just have taxpayers pay for the "gay gene" removal. After all, it is benefitting society.

My belief is that heterosexual society doesn't deserve people like us in the first place. Maybe it would be for the best.

So many important figures in history were homosexual. Such an impact on the world.
I think it's hard for people to realize what they have until it's gone.
Who will they put down, bash, and blame things on when we are gone? Will the world become one great big ball of harmony and happiness? If it's all genetics, and we were all created by God, what new excuses will we hear from the religious right on how such a thing could happen?

i rather get rid of the gene that causes people to believe in religion.
:roll:

THAT would benefit the entire planet.

If we can ever find the "stupid" gene, that should take care of that little defect.

There is no gene for that.

You'd have to start removing souls and human conscience.

"Souls and human conscience" have NOTHING to do with religion. Religon preys on superstition and fear of death.

 

[Gibsons]

P&N would be a good place for this thread.

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: datalink7

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
My point was not to say that homosexuals are any better than anyone else. We are not.

We're not better than straight people. But we are different than straight people. Very different.

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
The point I was trying to make was if we start modifying the genetic makeup of the future to keep our children from being gay, what will we lose out on?
May'be nothing. May'be everything.

I'd predict a gradual increase in aggressiveness, war, bad clothes, poor interior design, and a decline in beautiful things, fashion, taste, co-operation, good music.

That's stupid. I know a gay guy who pretty much acts like a "normal" guy and hates the "gay sterotype" that you just mentioned.

Yeah, "straight acting" gay guys hating the gay stereotype is the ultimate in homophobia. :disgust: I really can't stand assholes like that.

And yeah, there is a spectrum of "types" of gay men. I think we will find (eventually) that there are different biological pathways to homosexuality, producing different sub-types of homosexuals.

 

[JasonSix78]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
My point was not to say that homosexuals are any better than anyone else. We are not.

We're not better than straight people. But we are different than straight people. Very different.

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
The point I was trying to make was if we start modifying the genetic makeup of the future to keep our children from being gay, what will we lose out on?
May'be nothing. May'be everything.

I'd predict a gradual increase in aggressiveness, war, bad clothes, poor interior design, and a decline in beautiful things, fashion, taste, co-operation, good music.

So by that last statement you're essentially saying that homosexuals are, or will be, responsible for holding this planet together? Wow. You do believe that your lifestyle is superior.

-Jason