Processing power

v-600

Senior member
Nov 1, 2010
488
3
76
I've not really thought about processing power (recently everything has had more than enough for most of what I do) since I had an atom based aspire one 5 years ago.

The new macbook and the new surface have me interested again. From what I've read the Core M is good enough most of the time for most people, but it struggles with long periods of intensive action. Right now I have a surface pro 3 streaming to a chromecast doing on the fly transcoding from an .avi file. Watching the task manager the cpu is floating around 10-12% usage at about 0.8-1.2GHz (depending on the scene) with the odd spike up to max every 15 seconds or so. This is something my old Tegra3 Nexus 7 can just about cope with in short bursts so we're around the kind of real world level that starts to become an issue.

Is a Broadwell Core M running at 1.1GHz going to have comperable performance to a Broadwell Core i5 running at 1.1GHz? If not, what causes the differences? How will an Atom x7 compare?
 

v-600

Senior member
Nov 1, 2010
488
3
76
I understand that its just a base clock. I was wondering more whether the Core M would perform the same tasks at a similar clock speed rather than the maximum performance possible from each. I assume the different models in the table are just binned depending on their quality rather than being completely different models.
 

v-600

Senior member
Nov 1, 2010
488
3
76
Yeah, I was starting to get that from a few more of the reviews I read. It would be interesting to see from a purely theoretical POV whether you could lock a CPU at a certain frequency when testing devices to see any differences, but in practice, you're right and it seems like per device varies more than per cpu.
 
Last edited:

Yuriman

Diamond Member
Jun 25, 2004
5,530
141
106
So far as I can tell, at a given clock, Core M performs the same as a Broadwell i5. It's just going to downclock a lot sooner due to TDP restrictions.