Pro-War Logic

[swifty3]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Insane3D

Originally posted by: dahunan
If I would have seen that user around here before then maybe I would have.. but I hate it when people come in here just to bash others.

No offense, but you seem to have that exact attitude towards anyone who is against the war or protests against our government.

Hello??

Are you saying that I am only here to bash people and make fun of people? You might want to re-read some of my replies to others. People are entitled to their opinions. I have respect for war protesters who do not infringe upon the rights of other Americans to get their point across.

In other words, as long as war protestors are silent and do not voice their opinions, everything is fine.....really good in fact....but if they infringe upon the rights of others (namely you) by voicing their opinions, then you have no respect for them (war protestors that is).

 

[swifty3]

Originally posted by: BaDaBooM

Originally posted by: Morph

Originally posted by: dahunan
I didn't even click your link, but can you tell me what you would have done immediately after the WTC Murders and Pentagon Bombing happened if you were the President of the US?


What type of action would you have taken

Defensive or Offensive?

I would have found Isama Bin Laden and strung him up by the balls. What's your point? Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

We'll see about that. I know they don't have any solid proof of it yet, but I think (just my opinion) that they will find out Saddam knew about it ahead of time. Just too many little indications for me like the 9/11 murals on their walls, how they talked about Bin Laden and hinted at 9/11 in their state run newspaper before it happened, and the reports of the Iraqi ran terrorist training camps. Usually when there is a doubt, there is no doubt. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.

Once again another wish wash no-evidence opinion from a patriotic blockhead. Why don't you change your icon to a USA flag like all the other die-hard patriot morons here. And then come back and provide some FVCKIN EVIDENCE for your claims that there is a 9/11 Iraq connection. And what the hell does this mean? Usually when there is a doubt, there is no doubt. Are you an idiot?

 

[Wheezer]

Once again another wish wash no-evidence opinion from a patriotic blockhead

Once again the liberal left shows it's true colors.

You people cannot have a conversation without resorting to name calling...so sad that when all else fails you revert back to childish behavior.

BTW is is because of "patriotic blockheads" you can sit behind that computer and have the freedom of speech to call others names.

 

[Alistar7]

9/11 was an act of terrorism, Iraq has committed acts of terrorism. link.

 

[elzmaddy]

9/11 was an act of terrorism, Iraq has committed acts of terrorism. link.

How about this: Hiroshima was a terrorist act (mass murder of civilians) committed by the US. Therefore, the US should be bombed to bits. Make sense?

 

[Jani]

Hiroshima was pre-emptive strike which ended WWII and that way saved millions of people.

 

[Judgement]

Originally posted by: elzmaddy

9/11 was an act of terrorism, Iraq has committed acts of terrorism. link.

How about this: Hiroshima was a terrorist act (mass murder of civilians) committed by the US. Therefore, the US should be bombed to bits. Make sense?

Hiroshima was a tactical military target, not outright killing of civilians without any military presence nearby like the twin towers were. Your comparison is flawed.

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: Judgement

Originally posted by: elzmaddy

9/11 was an act of terrorism, Iraq has committed acts of terrorism. link.

How about this: Hiroshima was a terrorist act (mass murder of civilians) committed by the US. Therefore, the US should be bombed to bits. Make sense?

Hiroshima was a tactical military target, not outright killing of civilians without any military presence nearby like the twin towers were. Your comparison is flawed.

While at the same time it was also a very strong message. They were very aware the first one could have gone right to Tokyo..

 

[BaDaBooM]

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: Judgement

Originally posted by: elzmaddy

9/11 was an act of terrorism, Iraq has committed acts of terrorism. link.

How about this: Hiroshima was a terrorist act (mass murder of civilians) committed by the US. Therefore, the US should be bombed to bits. Make sense?

Hiroshima was a tactical military target, not outright killing of civilians without any military presence nearby like the twin towers were. Your comparison is flawed.

While at the same time it was also a very strong message. They were very aware the first one could have gone right to Tokyo..

Also they did drop thousands of leaflets ahead of time to keep the civillian deaths down. I believe Nagasaki was pretty desolate before that one went off (though, yea, I know many people still died in it that didn't have the sense to leave).

 

[Pocket]

Originally posted by: BaDaBooM

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: Judgement

Originally posted by: elzmaddy

9/11 was an act of terrorism, Iraq has committed acts of terrorism. link.

How about this: Hiroshima was a terrorist act (mass murder of civilians) committed by the US. Therefore, the US should be bombed to bits. Make sense?

Hiroshima was a tactical military target, not outright killing of civilians without any military presence nearby like the twin towers were. Your comparison is flawed.

While at the same time it was also a very strong message. They were very aware the first one could have gone right to Tokyo..

Also they did drop thousands of leaflets ahead of time to keep the civillian deaths down. I believe Nagasaki was pretty desolate before that one went off (though, yea, I know many people still died in it that didn't have the sense to leave).

Yeah, I think they were anti-war protestors.

 

[swifty3]

Originally posted by: BaDaBooM

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: Judgement

Originally posted by: elzmaddy

9/11 was an act of terrorism, Iraq has committed acts of terrorism. link.

How about this: Hiroshima was a terrorist act (mass murder of civilians) committed by the US. Therefore, the US should be bombed to bits. Make sense?

Hiroshima was a tactical military target, not outright killing of civilians without any military presence nearby like the twin towers were. Your comparison is flawed.

While at the same time it was also a very strong message. They were very aware the first one could have gone right to Tokyo..

Also they did drop thousands of leaflets ahead of time to keep the civillian deaths down. I believe Nagasaki was pretty desolate before that one went off (though, yea, I know many people still died in it that didn't have the sense to leave).

Yea, like 200,000 people. Is that your example of "keeping the deaths down."

 

[TheShiz]

Originally posted by: elzmaddy

9/11 was an act of terrorism, Iraq has committed acts of terrorism. link.

How about this: Hiroshima was a terrorist act (mass murder of civilians) committed by the US. Therefore, the US should be bombed to bits. Make sense?

there are much better examples of US acts of terrorism, heres a good one:



destruction of pharmaceutical plant in sudan

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: TheShiz

Originally posted by: elzmaddy

9/11 was an act of terrorism, Iraq has committed acts of terrorism. link.

How about this: Hiroshima was a terrorist act (mass murder of civilians) committed by the US. Therefore, the US should be bombed to bits. Make sense?

there are much better examples of US acts of terrorism, heres a good one:



destruction of pharmaceutical plant in sudan

That attack could very well have stopped WMD from being part of 9/11.

 

[TheShiz]

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: TheShiz

Originally posted by: elzmaddy

9/11 was an act of terrorism, Iraq has committed acts of terrorism. link.

How about this: Hiroshima was a terrorist act (mass murder of civilians) committed by the US. Therefore, the US should be bombed to bits. Make sense?

there are much better examples of US acts of terrorism, heres a good one:



destruction of pharmaceutical plant in sudan

That attack could very well have stopped WMD from being part of 9/11.

please read the 3 parts of that article and come back with some evidence for that statement. Also, notice how the sources for the article are mostly the New York Times, interesting indeed, i'm guessing you read that somewhere and simply took it as fact without really knowing about the situation.