Sorry, can't let this slide. You are regurgitating talking points without question. Are you really this naive? What services does PP provide other than abortions? And if the feds give money to PP what controls are in place to make sure that the money does not go to abortions? Do you really believe that the millions of abortions PP has performed were paid for by the women that had them? My god man, try not to appear this ignorant.
http://liveactionnews.org/women-calling-planned-parenthood-finding-theres-no-prenatal-care/
No prenatal care, no mammograms. Birth control and abortions, that pretty much covers it. Watch the video to see Cecile Richards telling lie after lie after lie.
Now that I've said that I am also in agreement with imported_tajmahal in post #2. I might go a bit further and state that I have real issues with women using abortion as a means of birth control. Cutting off funding to PP should remedy that rather quickly though.
WHO WE ARE:
Live Action News is the publishing arm of Live Action. Live Action is an organization dedicated to building a culture of life and advancing human rights. Live Action uses powerful and dynamic media platforms to educate the public about the humanity of the preborn and investigative journalism to expose the threats against the vulnerable and defenseless.
you really should have, because:Sorry, can't let this slide.
You are regurgitating talking points without question. Are you really this naive? What services does PP provide other than abortions?
.
you really should have, because:
that is horribly ignorant. I mean, it takes you like 2 minutes to actually inform yourself. Post-fact world and all, I know, but something tells me you have been dug into your alt-reality for at least 10, 20 years by now. So sad. Why do you choose ignorance? Why do you choose to base your issues on demonstrably false accounts? LoL--anyone that wants to de-fund PP must really love abortions, because that is what will happen. That's a fact.
You should join the super pro-abortion club, whenever it starts up, with all of you PP de-funders. Probably won't be a popular club, but that's where you belong.
If you decide to have a kid and the fetus dies before being born are you responsible?
Personal responsibility and good public policy are not mutually exclusive.
I'm for both
How is getting an abortion and preventing decades of future issues not taking personal responsibility? That's be like saying if you clogged the toilet in your house, you shouldn't be allowed to fix it for 18 years to show you took personal responsibility for the clog.
So when you say "pro-personal responsibility" your are actually saying "pro-punishment of child and mother due to her daring to have sex." Then you take no personal responsibility for your decision to force her to have the punishment child.
No. That is a stupid question.
Obviously, but it's not about ending abortion. It's about punishing other for sex. Hence all the talk about others taking responsibility for their actions while taking none themselves.
Abortions reduced more under "pro-choice" Clinton and Obama reduced abortions more than "pro-life" Reagan and Bush's.
If you want to reduce abortions, the answer is to improve the economy, which means electing Democrats.
I'm OK with pro choice within reason. I am against late term abortions, partial birth abortions etc. I am against abortion being used as a birth control method. If you want to have sex without babies use birth control that you provide for yourself. If you are too stupid to use birth control and get pregnant, then wait until too late to get an abortion there are plenty of people that really want a child. Give it up for someone that is responsible enough to raise a child.
No punishment found.
Why , never heard of abstinence? Or did someone hold a gun to your head and make you have sex?
So why are you not responsible for reckless endangerment leading to the death of your "baby".
A woman having an abortion has about a 99+% chance of "killling a single baby" according to pro-lifers such as yourself. You on the other hand have a 50% chance that the fetus excuse me "baby" "dies" before reaching birth every time you try and have a child
Lots a dead kids following prolife logic.
Seems like you want to hold others responsible but not yourself.
Republicans tried abstinence only policies. Want to guess their success rate? Ever heard of Bristol Palin?Why , never heard of abstinence? Or did someone hold a gun to your head and make you have sex?
So why are you not responsible for reckless endangerment leading to the death of your "baby".
A woman having an abortion has about a 99+% chance of "killling a single baby" according to pro-lifers such as yourself. You on the other hand have a 50% chance that the fetus excuse me "baby" "dies" before reaching birth every time you try and have a child
Lots a dead kids following prolife logic.
Seems like you want to hold others responsible but not yourself.
It's almost like treating a fetus the exact same as a baby doesn't make sense.This comment you just made deserves no response.
That has to be one of the most fucked up analysis that I have ever read.
Republicans tried abstinence only policies. Want to guess their success rate? Ever heard of Bristol Palin?
Imagine a poor Bristol Palin who doesn't have a mom who can bilk $ out of conservatives. State winds up supporting. But with provided birth control you don't doom a child to poverty and the girl has a change for a life. Better for everyone all around
There is birth control available to all now without the taxpayer having to foot the bill.
This is what the liberal bubble looks like.Isn't everyone pro-life? I can't imagine someone being anti-life.
You ought to update your idea of a lot of things these days.
Wearing a government issued rubber while banging a hammer in Subic Bay has not been a thing from for many decades.
I imagine you like formaldehyde in your beer also.
Video by O'Keefe...nuff said.Breast exams. Cervical cancer screening. Pregnancy tests and option consultation. STD tests and treatment. Sex education. Vasectomies (yes, they take care of men, too). LGBT services.
Also, remember that PP is primarily private-funded. In 2014, only $528 million of the organization's $1.3 billion in revenue came from the government; it doesn't need government money to perform abortions, and it's already legally restricted from using those funds to that end. Cutting off government funding likely wouldn't stop abortions; however, it would hurt services across the board. And just because a woman didn't pay for an abortion out of her own pocket doesn't mean it was government-funded.
Also in 2014: out of 9.5 million total services performed, there were 324,000 abortions. Abortion not only isn't the majority of what it does, it's a tiny number.
What's that, you say? An anti-abortion website lied to you to push its agenda? Color me shocked.
You ought to update your idea of a lot of things these days.
Wearing a government issued rubber while banging a hammer in Subic Bay has not been a thing from for many decades.
I imagine you like formaldehyde in your beer also.
LOL at the Subic Bay!
...........
A rubber beats nothing when you can't afford the fancy stuff or the child.
I personally wish the barriers to getting non-condom BC were lowered and BC made cheaper. I think Obamacare has done a decent job in this regard, but could be better like making the pill over the counter, or allowing a pharmacist the ability to help pick one for a patient. I also think medicaid should provide good forms of BC from a good business stand point.
I'm OK with pro choice within reason. I am against late term abortions, partial birth abortions etc. I am against abortion being used as a birth control method. If you want to have sex without babies use birth control that you provide for yourself. If you are too stupid to use birth control and get pregnant, then wait until too late to get an abortion there are plenty of people that really want a child. Give it up for someone that is responsible enough to raise a child.
No punishment found.