As they only need to bump the RAM 25MHz (~6%) I'd hope so. The performance difference is tiny in any case.good deal, cant most 5900s hit ultra?
Originally posted by: Quixfire
Yeah, if you didn't care about image quality or using AA or AF.
Originally posted by: Genx87
FX5900 going for 200 bucks on pricewatch.com
9800 NP 250
This should drive the 5700 Ultras into the 150 range which makes them a better match for the 9600 Pro.
Originally posted by: Rollo
As they only need to bump the RAM 25MHz (~6%) I'd hope so. The performance difference is tiny in any case.good deal, cant most 5900s hit ultra?
Originally posted by: Pete
Originally posted by: Rollo
As they only need to bump the RAM 25MHz (~6%) I'd hope so. The performance difference is tiny in any case.good deal, cant most 5900s hit ultra?
You mean bump the core 50MHz (~12%). The RAM speed is the same on the 5900 and 5900U. You're probably comparing a 5900U and 5950U.
Originally posted by: modedepe
Originally posted by: Pete
Originally posted by: Rollo
As they only need to bump the RAM 25MHz (~6%) I'd hope so. The performance difference is tiny in any case.good deal, cant most 5900s hit ultra?
You mean bump the core 50MHz (~12%). The RAM speed is the same on the 5900 and 5900U. You're probably comparing a 5900U and 5950U.
The ram is different on the 5900u and 5900nu--sometimes. The 5900u is supposed to have 2.2ns and be clocked at 850. The 5900 has 2.2ns sometimes, other times 2.8ns. It comes clocked at 800.
This is what I thought the deal was, didn't know there were 5900NUs with 850 memory.The ram is different on the 5900u and 5900nu--sometimes. The 5900u is supposed to have 2.2ns and be clocked at 850. The 5900 has 2.2ns sometimes, other times 2.8ns. It comes clocked at 800.