Why is it that those who naysay the effects of prestige in education and careers are invariably the ones who lack it? While there are many things wrong with how the world works, with the prizing of name over substance (although the prestige of name at some point came about from substance), I don't see the validity of this whole, "name just gets you in the door, it's up to you after that" argument as an argument against prestige... That's exactly the point! You can have all the skill you want, but if you don't get in the door, you might as well have no skill at all. Moreover, those with academic pedigree almost invariably have the skill to succeed at the jobs they do. Why? Because there really isn't much that can't be taught on the job - and those with academic pedigree are smart enough to teach themselves.
