Originally posted by: Red Dawn
The thing is the more desperate they get the more successful at killing American Soldiers they become.
Originally posted by: jjsole
In other words he has no answer for their increasingly deadly attacks.
He said those who are continuing to engage in violence ?can?t stand the thought of a free society. They hate freedom. They love terror. They love to try to create fear and chaos.?
Originally posted by: tallest1
He said those who are continuing to engage in violence ?can?t stand the thought of a free society. They hate freedom. They love terror. They love to try to create fear and chaos.?
omfg, Bush is a true propoganda machine
Amen!Bush is desparate to put some lipstick on this pig. I think the only one benefitting from this are the Russians, since the Wahabbi whackos that normally go fight them in Chechnya might be diverted to go fight in Iraq
and a rather simple personOriginally posted by: tallest1
He said those who are continuing to engage in violence ?can?t stand the thought of a free society. They hate freedom. They love terror. They love to try to create fear and chaos.?
omfg, Bush is a true propoganda machine
Originally posted by: Czar
and a rather simple personOriginally posted by: tallest1
He said those who are continuing to engage in violence ?can?t stand the thought of a free society. They hate freedom. They love terror. They love to try to create fear and chaos.?
omfg, Bush is a true propoganda machine
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: Czar
and a rather simple personOriginally posted by: tallest1
He said those who are continuing to engage in violence ?can?t stand the thought of a free society. They hate freedom. They love terror. They love to try to create fear and chaos.?
omfg, Bush is a true propoganda machine
I wouldn't say that. People have been consistently underestimating him, and look he is the President after all.
Underestimating your oppostion almost never leads to victory either in Iraq or in domestic US politics.
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: Czar
and a rather simple personOriginally posted by: tallest1
He said those who are continuing to engage in violence ?can?t stand the thought of a free society. They hate freedom. They love terror. They love to try to create fear and chaos.?
omfg, Bush is a true propoganda machine
I wouldn't say that. People have been consistently underestimating him, and look he is the President after all.
Underestimating your oppostion almost never leads to victory either in Iraq or in domestic US politics.
anyone who thinks that those who are fighting the US in iraq love fear, chaos and terror is a simple person, there is no simple answer to the why but Bush seems to think so
well thats true, propaganda stuff, but we realy have no other option but to make an opinion on him based on what he says, not what he thinksOriginally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: Czar
and a rather simple personOriginally posted by: tallest1
He said those who are continuing to engage in violence ?can?t stand the thought of a free society. They hate freedom. They love terror. They love to try to create fear and chaos.?
omfg, Bush is a true propoganda machine
I wouldn't say that. People have been consistently underestimating him, and look he is the President after all.
Underestimating your oppostion almost never leads to victory either in Iraq or in domestic US politics.
anyone who thinks that those who are fighting the US in iraq love fear, chaos and terror is a simple person, there is no simple answer to the why but Bush seems to think so
He doesn't really even neccessarily have to think that. That sort of statement is esentially only to play to the domestic audience. It reinforces this vision of the mindless hatefull enemy, kind of like the Hun, or the Jap. We are good, they are bad kind of crap. I am sure that is not the premise out military commanders are working from. It doesn't really mean anything practically.
I wouldn't say that. People have been consistently underestimating him, and look he is the President after all.
Underestimating your oppostion almost never leads to victory either in Iraq or in domestic US politics.
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
I certainly do not underestimate the President. He's clearly one of the worst . . . ever. And with our history of driftwood that's certainly an accomplishment.
Originally posted by: TerryMathews
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
I certainly do not underestimate the President. He's clearly one of the worst . . . ever. And with our history of driftwood that's certainly an accomplishment.
I know the war in Iraq is unpopular and at the moment President-bashing is the hip thing to do, but if you thing George W. Bush is one of the worst Presidents in history, you need to go back to History class. I'll grant you he's nowhere near the top, but he's far from the bottom. Those places are reserved for the likes of Nixon, Johnson, (arguably) Truman, Coolidge, and I'm sure about 7 others I can't think of ATM because it's pushing 2AM here in Ohio.
The bottom line is if you think running a deficit and making war on a soverign nation are the worst things a President can do, you must be new to American politics.
Nixon ran an unpopular war, stole an election, and lied about both. True. But Bush stole the 2000 election, STARTED an increasingly unpopular war, and has continued to lie about both.
Johnson ran an unpopular war, lied about it, and quite possibly arranged for the assanation of John F. Kennedy.give me a break. That whole theory is bullsh!t.
Truman (as I understand it) killed more civilans than anyone in history.Where did you get this? I guess it's reffering to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but even so, FDR probably killed more civilians with the Strategic Bombing Campaign (ever heard of it?). We bombed city after city to the ground. Plus FDR started the Manhattan project. Get your facts straight, dude.
You think Bush is business-friendly? Business and industry knew no greater ally than Coolidge.There was no new deal legislation to roll back, so no, Bush and Reagan probably both take the cake.
And if you think the President has any real control over the economy, you're dumber than you sound. You're right, a president does not have REAL CONTROL over the economy. He does have a GREAT INFLUENCE over the economy, though.