People seem to be giving Bush a lot of flak for going into Iraq because he said they have WMD and nothing ever showed up.
I believe that saying they had WMD was just an excuse to get into Iraq. Continuing on that, I believe that Bush looked at this very simply. Sadam and his sons are aweful people, terrorists, murderers that needed to be thrown out of power (being dead or alive). Some people say that he was looking for something to have his name tied to for fame. I say that if that is true, I don't believe it was main reason.
My question: What would people have supported Bush if he had just come out and said at the start "These people are dangerous and need to be removed. The potential threat these people have to humanity exceeds the necessity of proof"
I believe that saying they had WMD was just an excuse to get into Iraq. Continuing on that, I believe that Bush looked at this very simply. Sadam and his sons are aweful people, terrorists, murderers that needed to be thrown out of power (being dead or alive). Some people say that he was looking for something to have his name tied to for fame. I say that if that is true, I don't believe it was main reason.
My question: What would people have supported Bush if he had just come out and said at the start "These people are dangerous and need to be removed. The potential threat these people have to humanity exceeds the necessity of proof"