I rarely watch fox for anything, I don't like the propaganda.
Pointing out the trouble the dems are facing says nothing about them supporting him. A Detroit Lions fan pointing out that the team is in trouble and going to lose doesn't mean he doesn't support the team. The reality is that for the most part (again, fox excepted), the media supports Obama and his policies, and they certainly prefer him over any republican candidate by a wide margin.
That's baloney. Sure, they complain, because they want him to be even *further* to the left than what he is now, but do you really think for a second that in an election they don't support him over whoever the republican candidate is? Get real. That's like fox attacking McCain over certain issues where they consider him too liberal. Sure they attacked him, but at the end of the day would you say they supported McCain or Obama?
He said nothing about pitching a conservative agenda. He said fox was promoting it's viewpoints, and that those viewpoints were destructive to America:
It isn't like 'the left' has been restrained about anything, and I don't expect them to be. The 'right' and 'left' can say whatever they want. They are not the president, he is. Part of that job is knowing what is appropriate to say.
They (whoever you're referring to) are not the POTUS, he is. Also, as I pointed out, he didn't say that conservatism is destructive (which would have been equally stupid since the country is generally fairly conservative), he said fox - like Hearst newspapers in the past - promoted their viewpoints, viewpoints he considers destructive to America.
His comments fall under "bush league", I would have expected better.