- Jan 16, 2005
- 3,914
- 0
- 0
In all the articals I see here I see many tests done to get as close to possible to a true "real use" preformance guide.
What I dont see is a 'weight' tool for users to, on a scale of one to five (or whatever), to tell a system what sort of process is most used, the system weighs it against known and redundant results from this site (possibly with others that wis to do the same and are trusted, unbiased) and calculates a point answer based on CPUs/RAM ect on the pricerange/newness/ect.
The point answer then queries a weekly/daily results of several websites that sell sought product to preform a true preformance
rice ratio based on the lowest price (or users choice of website venders) results.
With an FAQ some links to articals where results came from ect ect, this could be a better way to get a _general understanding_ of what CPU/RAM/ECT (or combo of whatever) can get the best preformance per dollar.
What I dont see is a 'weight' tool for users to, on a scale of one to five (or whatever), to tell a system what sort of process is most used, the system weighs it against known and redundant results from this site (possibly with others that wis to do the same and are trusted, unbiased) and calculates a point answer based on CPUs/RAM ect on the pricerange/newness/ect.
The point answer then queries a weekly/daily results of several websites that sell sought product to preform a true preformance
rice ratio based on the lowest price (or users choice of website venders) results. With an FAQ some links to articals where results came from ect ect, this could be a better way to get a _general understanding_ of what CPU/RAM/ECT (or combo of whatever) can get the best preformance per dollar.
Facebook
Twitter