Strange that I'd largely agree with Pabster-
" I think Fitzgerald is a saint compared to Starr.
He's under enormous pressure right now. Damned if he does, damned if he don't. If he lets the grand jury expire and doesn't indict anyone, the Dems are going to go ballistic. If he indicts people, the Reps are going ballistic. And he'll have a lot of explaining to do either way.
Let's just hope he tells the people the straight story, instead of slinking away like Starr and writing a book."
Fitzgerald just needs to do what the law and the evidence tell him to do, which will obviously be to issue indictments for whatever crimes he thinks he can prove, let the chips fall where they may. It'll be tough for Repub partisans to whine effectively with their heroes behind bars. Even if he doesn't seek indictments on the national security charges at this time, it's amazing what the prospect of a plea bargain can do to loosen perjurers' tongues. That's part of what happened in Watergate, and about a zillion other criminal conspiracy cases... take the fifth or tell the truth, just don't do anything as stupid as lying to a grand jury...
As for Starr, he didn't have a straight story to tell. Slinking was his basic MO all along. He set out to get Clinton for something, anything, and it really didn't matter who else got hurt in the process... History will reveal his tenure as special prosecutor as a partisan hatchet job.