WelshBloke
Lifer
- Jan 12, 2005
- 31,444
- 9,348
- 136
"Secular values" is not the solution, either. I recall one of the most (if not THE most) bloodiest centuries on record being the MOST secular century, the 20th.
That's more to do with increasing military technology than anything else.
That said there's been some pretty bloody bits of ancient history.
I'm saying it makes no sense to condemn people for"following" their religion and then also condemn them for NOT "following" it.
Anyone "following" their religion are deemed terrorists, and those not are called "liars".
You're missing the point.
What's the point in following a religion when you don't actually believe it?
You have to admit that it's a weird logical position to take. You believe in a god that doesn't make mistakes but you don't believe what he says.
If you pick and choose bits of a religion at what point does it stop being that religion and because something different?