power consumption, p4 vs atom

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
I'm attempting to build a closet system to serve up files, print, download torrents and other random tasks. Ive found two platforms that i'm considering.
Intel P4 @ 2.4Ghz
Intel Atom 330 @ 1.6(dual core)


this system will be on 24/7..... how much more power will the p4 use as opposed to the atom.....i'm assuming over 90% idle time. what is the yearly energy cost diifference? I know the atom is toted as a power saver, but it's more expensive than the p4 that i'm looking at. will the lower power consumption outweigh the original cost?
 

evolucion8

Platinum Member
Jun 17, 2005
2,867
3
81
A typical Atom system idling will consume usually less than 4W of power, and will never go higher than 11W in full load, but a typical 2.4GHz Pentium 4 will idle sipping 40W of power easily and it could go as high as 86W on full load, definitively the lower power consumption will outweight the total original cost and will make you coffee!!
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
http://www.anandtech.com/systems/showdoc.aspx?i=3321&p=5
Asus Eee Box 20w under load.

Some assorted P4 systems:
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2275&p=13
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2353&p=4
FROM 100w idle (Yes, Prescotts in the 110~120w range for the most part but take a ~90w number for a P4 system based on the 3.4EE beinng 100w)


http://www.anandtech.com/casecoolingpsus/showdoc.aspx?i=3458&p=2
An article covering power consumption comparisons.
A 90w system will use ~$72/yr idle.
A 160w system will use ~128/yr idle. (cheapest energy prices).
That's a 70w difference giving >$50 in electricity/yr costs.

Now if you assume a 70w difference between the Atom and a P4, then the Atom will cost at least $50 less over the course of a year assuming 24/7 running.
The more expensive your electricity is, the greater the savings, but $50 is an approximate minimum.
 

21stHermit

Senior member
Dec 16, 2003
927
1
81
will the lower power consumption outweigh the original cost?
Highly unlikely you will ever recover your initial cost in power savings.

Having said that, if power saving is your goal, go Atom Pine Trail, not the older 230/330. A PT D510 (dual core) soldered to a MB is $75 and uses half the power of N330.

A typical Atom system idling will consume usually less than 4W of power, and will never go higher than 11W in full load, but a typical 2.4GHz Pentium 4 will idle sipping 40W of power easily and it could go as high as 86W on full load, definitively the lower power consumption will outweight the total original cost and will make you coffee!!
Nonsense, that 4W is the TDP not the power at the wall. I have an Atom 330 I'm typing this on, it idles at 37 watts. The Atom itself is a fraction of the load. Add the 945 IGP, HDD, ODD, PSU loses, MB overhead, etc. A typical PSU takes over 4W with nothing connected. Your numbers for the P4 are closer to the mark.
 
Last edited:

Lorne

Senior member
Feb 5, 2001
873
1
76
I would assume there is more functionallity and control over the Atom then the P4 not to mention future expantion.

CPU consumption is not your only watt verible, Motherboard size, Addon GPU or IGPU (AGP cards are powerhogs all around)

Even a super low end Core2 system would be better then anything P4 as a closetserver.
 

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
based on your caclulations, the p4 is the better way to go. the atom system would be $220 where i can get the p4 system for $55. that's three years of power i'd have to make up, and in those three years i can enjoy much more power.
 

evolucion8

Platinum Member
Jun 17, 2005
2,867
3
81
Highly unlikely you will ever recover your initial cost in power savings.

Having said that, if power saving is your goal, go Atom Pine Trail, not the older 230/330. A PT D510 (dual core) soldered to a MB is $75 and uses half the power of N330.

Nonsense, that 4W is the TDP not the power at the wall. I have an Atom 330 I'm typing this on, it idles at 37 watts. The Atom itself is a fraction of the load. Add the 945 IGP, HDD, ODD, PSU loses, MB overhead, etc. A typical PSU takes over 4W with nothing connected. Your numbers for the P4 are closer to the mark.

For your information, I was talking about the TDP, not at the power at the wall. A Pentium 4 can suck by itself 86W just for fun, an atom will never get that close, plus if you buy an Atom that runs at 1.60GHz or higher, it might outperform slighly the Pentium 4 at 2.40GHz, but in terms of overall performance, the Pentium 4 is simply better, but horribly inefficient in terms of performance/power ratio.
 

Auric

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,591
2
71
Choose the power supply carefully too so that the average draw is within its most effficient range.
 

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
Highly unlikely you will ever recover your initial cost in power savings.

Having said that, if power saving is your goal, go Atom Pine Trail, not the older 230/330. A PT D510 (dual core) soldered to a MB is $75 and uses half the power of N330.

Nonsense, that 4W is the TDP not the power at the wall. I have an Atom 330 I'm typing this on, it idles at 37 watts. The Atom itself is a fraction of the load. Add the 945 IGP, HDD, ODD, PSU loses, MB overhead, etc. A typical PSU takes over 4W with nothing connected. Your numbers for the P4 are closer to the mark.

How could that be? When my laptop is disconencted from power, it usually consumes 10-15watts idle with wifi on and the LCD on. Thats using a Core 2 duo.
 

Farfrumhumpn

Banned
Nov 22, 2009
210
0
0
Honestly, I saw the title and was like. . . How are they different? P4 and atom splitting both give off the same heat don't they? :D

Honestly, it's the difference between walking in the cool night then suddenly falling down a deep hole and going * OMGOMGOMG !!! THE HELLFIRES ARE BURNING ME !!! *

It's the differences between a failed attempt at lighting a fart then suceeding only to have the fiery ball of gas sucked back into your lower intestines while yelling * OOHHHHH MY GOOOODDDD !!!!! *
 
Last edited:

Auric

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,591
2
71
Dunno about the numbers, but that old chipset actually consumed more power than Atom itself, hence the importance to go with the purposely designed Pine Trail platform.
 

lyssword

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2005
5,630
25
91
Honestly, I saw the title and was like. . . How are they different? P4 and atom splitting both give off the same heat don't they? :D

Honestly, it's the difference between walking in the cool night then suddenly falling down a deep hole and going * OMGOMGOMG !!! THE HELLFIRES ARE BURNING ME !!! *

It's the differences between a failed attempt at lighting a fart then suceeding only to have the fiery ball of gas sucked back into your lower intestines while yelling * OOHHHHH MY GOOOODDDD !!!!! *

:D Funniest thing I've read today :D
 

coolVariable

Diamond Member
May 18, 2001
3,724
0
76
Definitely go with the P4 ... as others have said, you won't be able to recover the higher upfront costs for the atom.
and you can maybe underclock the P4???
For your needs you might be fine with a P4 at 1GHz.