• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Pot poll - embrace or disgrace ?

kamikaze27

Senior member
Smokers one side, non smokers another. Blah-Blah.
How do these numbers work out of the more social scene behind the desks of ATOT users?

Could one critisize a smoker? Are we going into religion wars again?
Back off, and we will do likewise.
We might even outnumber you.
 
I don't smoke (pot or otherwise) and never have. I don't support smoking. But I do support peoples' rights to be idiots and do it themselves. 😀 Puff puff pass, bro!
 
Originally posted by: AbAbber2k
I don't smoke (pot or otherwise) and never have. I don't support smoking. But I do support peoples' rights to be idiots and do it themselves. 😀 Puff puff pass, bro!

isn't the support of other people to smoke basically supporting smoking pot? i'm confused...maybe you don't support it for yourself, but if you believe others should have the right to if they want, then it sounds like you would support the legalization of marijuana.
 
Wheres the poll option for "just about anything is fine in moderation"?

I do however find it hard to justify that the #1 reason people are in prison in the USA is for multiple MJ possesion charges! Silly me, but I somhow feel those spaces should be reserved for violent criminals, child-molesters, bank robbers, cop-killers etc & that perhaps the money WASTED (pun intended) trying to eliminate weed might be better spent controlling far more harmful drugs like say, cocaine or heroin?
 
Originally posted by: Captante
Wheres the poll option for "just about anything is fine in moderation"?

I do however find it hard to justify that the #1 reason people are in prison in the USA is for multiple MJ possesion charges! Silly me, but I somhow feel those spaces should be reserved for violent criminals, child-molesters, bank robbers, cop-killers etc & that perhaps the money WASTED (pun intended) trying to eliminate weed might be better spent controlling far more harmful drugs like say, cocaine or heroin?

no, becoz we'd have to start another poll to see what moderation standards are for all substances. but yeah, that would be where my vote is also.
 
Used to smoke a lot back in the day (2004-05).

This is how it works now: I no longer buy pot. I no longer feel the need to smoke pot. But every once in a month, I will be with someone who wants to light up and needs company. I don't mind lighting up and getting a little high.

Edit: I voted for the 4th option because it is the one that made the least sense to me.
 
Originally posted by: kamikaze27
no, becoz we'd have to start another poll to see what moderation standards are for all substances. but yeah, that would be where my vote is also.

not really...moderation is up to the discretion of the individual, so there aren't really moderation "standards", so it is a viable option.
 
I'm something between a casual smoker and "explorer". Used to smoke a lot but when it became a habit it just wasn't fun anymore. Now it's more of a weekend thing for me, some like to do couple of shots, I rather toke up. Guess that makes me a "moron" and "idiot" :roll:
 
Originally posted by: MikeO
I'm something between a casual smoker and "explorer". Used to smoke a lot but when it became a habit it just wasn't fun anymore. Now it's more of a weekend thing for me, some like to do couple of shots, I rather toke up. Guess that makes me a "moron" and "idiot" :roll:

it makes you a "dude" not a "douche" 😉
 
Back
Top