Post Your OC'ed UT2004 Demo Benchmarks

[Technonut]

I am curious about what kind of UT2004 Demo benchmarks folks in this Forum are pulling with their OC'ed rigs...

DL the UT2004 Demo and use This to start benching...

ATi Cat 4.2 1280x1024 (3D Slider set to Optimal Performance)

dm-rankin
37.322460 / 78.643471 / 141.312454 fps
Score = 78.706863

as-convoy
18.874382 / 48.001652 / 72.973488 fps
Score = 48.063023

ons-torlan
7.959090 / 86.375694 / 127.753494 fps
Score = 86.507019

br-colossus
29.144190 / 113.301178 / 245.411758 fps
Score = 113.452225

ctf-bridgeoffate
36.929985 / 137.864532 / 241.901749 fps
Score = 138.093674

ATi Cat 4.2 1280x1024 (3D Slider set to Optimal Quality) 4XAA 16XAF

dm-rankin
31.268515 / 60.889908 / 136.660507 fps
Score = 60.965515

as-convoy
18.790466 / 41.142891 / 65.926735 fps
Score = 41.193626

ons-torlan
29.682625 / 51.731575 / 105.556786 fps
Score = 51.813732

br-colossus
28.645685 / 87.549164 / 208.152206 fps
Score = 87.650299

ctf-bridgeoffate
36.903957 / 84.852249 / 237.078949 fps
Score = 84.956207

 

[Soulkeeper]

i can't run it
it just throws my monitor refresh rates out of spec

i even tryed locking the refresh rates in the driver settings


ohh well....
it looked cool too

 

[slag]

the benchmark files you download have botmatch and flyby benchmarks, but no benchmarks that you have listed. What am I doing wrong?

For example, there is a botmatch-rankin and a flyby-rankin, but no dm rankin.

 

[Technonut]

Originally posted by: slag
the benchmark files you download have botmatch and flyby benchmarks, but no benchmarks that you have listed. What am I doing wrong?

For example, there is a botmatch-rankin and a flyby-rankin, but no dm rankin.

From what I understand, the Botmatch benchmarks are the ones that work best with the Demo... Just doubleclick botmatch-all.bat in the benchmark folder. The results will be in the lowframerate.log text file..

 

[Soulkeeper]

Originally posted by: Technonut

Originally posted by: slag
the benchmark files you download have botmatch and flyby benchmarks, but no benchmarks that you have listed. What am I doing wrong?

For example, there is a botmatch-rankin and a flyby-rankin, but no dm rankin.

From what I understand, the Botmatch benchmarks are the ones that work best with the Demo... Just doubleclick botmatch-all.bat in the benchmark folder. The results will be in the lowframerate.log text file..

yeah the more bots you have the more AI that has to be calculated
usually this results in a more cpu intensive benchmark

 

[SilverBack]

3.5GHz Prescott
9800 Pro 470/740
Corsair XMS3200 2(512) 5/4 ratio

Settings all High in game
4x AA 8x AF
1280x1024 32 bit color


dm-rankin
35.603867 / 69.849472 / 181.678528 fps
Score = 69.931282

as-convoy
21.790663 / 52.256237 / 93.811996 fps
Score = 52.327873

ons-torlan
14.034289 / 80.006149 / 140.619873 fps
Score = 80.121323

br-colossus
33.643578 / 123.370934 / 231.931580 fps
Score = 123.489799

ctf-bridgeoffate
37.147438 / 115.554558 / 236.707428 fps
Score = 115.742050

 

[Megatomic]

System Specs:
Abit NF7-S R2 BIOS21
AMD AXP 2500+ @ 3200+
1GB DDR @ PC3200 (2-2-2-11)
GF FX 5900 @ 450/900
WinXP Pro SP1a
DX9.0b
ForceWare 3.13 personally remixed
ForceWare 53.03

GPU Settings:
Image Settings set to Quality
Mipmap Detail Level set to Best Image Quality
AA/AF set to Application Controlled

Results:
dm-rankin
Score = 83.620224

as-convoy
Score = 50.767612

ons-torlan
Score = 80.256203

br-colossus
Score = 114.750359

ctf-bridgeoffate
Score = 115.028450

 

[JustStarting]

IC7-MAX3
3.0C @ 3.75g
2 x 256mb 1:1 @ 8-4-4-3
FX5900 @ 500/975

1280 x 1024 Performance

dm-rankin
47.996052 / 95.586372 / 219.438126 fps
Score = 95.718246

as-convoy
20.901779 / 62.896446 / 115.057571 fps
Score = 62.977886

ons-torlan
7.455823 / 92.880325 / 156.901321 fps
Score = 93.011955

br-colossus
27.194126 / 117.593048 / 274.451965 fps
Score = 117.686172

ctf-bridgeoffate
27.380560 / 130.489120 / 305.311249 fps
Score = 130.705338

1280 x 1024 Max Qaulity 4x AA, 8X AF

dm-rankin
47.358154 / 92.917961 / 214.076431 fps
Score = 93.050415

as-convoy
7.199370 / 60.445019 / 112.444534 fps
Score = 60.521896

ons-torlan
7.963544 / 87.525543 / 144.029800 fps
Score = 87.649635

br-colossus
26.706532 / 113.418137 / 244.696777 fps
Score = 113.512535

ctf-bridgeoffate
22.749977 / 125.951668 / 294.819153 fps
Score = 126.153816

Curious to see how you guys run Aquamark3??
57,200

edited- Mega... crank that 5900 up. Lets give these ATI's a run for their money!!

 

[Megatomic]

I'd say considering my CPU speed that my scores are pretty damn good already. I'll see what I can do about overclocking the CPU and the GPU some more for the sake of this thread.

 

[SilverBack]

I just redid mine, something is wrong with the CAT 4.2's when you select AA or AF by hand.
Below is simply the highest settings that you can set on the slider in the
3d settings applet.

BTW the game is really good looking at this level

1280x1024 32 bit
4x AA
AF 16x
AF Method Quality
Texture Preference High Quality
Mipmap detail High Quality
Vertical Sync App Preference
True form always off

3.5 Prescott 9800 Pro 470/740

dm-rankin
27.856289 / 58.639488 / 178.775253 fps
Score = 58.712204

as-convoy
21.524817 / 51.821831 / 91.639931 fps
Score = 51.893963

ons-torlan
13.866923 / 79.662537 / 142.469376 fps
Score = 79.768402

br-colossus
32.258308 / 122.673355 / 220.803619 fps
Score = 122.800499

ctf-bridgeoffate
36.845589 / 114.638885 / 221.460556 fps
Score = 114.822220

 

[Megatomic]

System Specs:
Abit NF7-S R2 BIOS21
AMD AXP 2500+ @ 215MHz x 10.5 (2250MHz)
1GB DDR @ DDR430 (2-2-2-11)
GF FX 5900 @ 475/950
WinXP Pro SP1a
DX9.0b
ForceWare 3.13 personally remixed
ForceWare 53.03

GPU Settings:
Image Settings set to Quality
Mipmap Detail Level set to Best Image Quality
AA/AF set to Application Controlled

Results:
dm-rankin
Score = 87.701920

as-convoy
Score = 52.913246

ons-torlan
Score = 82.122253

br-colossus
Score = 119.587273

ctf-bridgeoffate
Score = 119.865326

It looks like I'm about maxed out here. I've upped the speed on my CPU and GPU and I didn't get much in return. Suggestions?

 

[THUGSROOK]

ah! thx Techno!
ill post later tonight, after i put my rig back together....

 

[slag]

P4 2.6 @ 3.3 ghz. 1 gb pc3200 corsair bh-5, radeon 9500 softmod to 9700 @ 371/308 PAT not enabled.
ATi Cat 4.2 1280x1024 (3D Slider set to Optimal Performance)

dm-rankin
5.691651 / 169.917175 / 1.#INF00 fps ???????????? must be a glitch
Score = 169.226913

dm-rankin
32.147541 / 68.001137 / 125.329971 fps
Score = 68.089378

as-convoy
16.229643 / 41.234238 / 69.792435 fps
Score = 41.292446

ons-torlan
17.581491 / 59.762268 / 97.933441 fps
Score = 59.851704

br-colossus
23.041897 / 95.261589 / 181.796631 fps
Score = 95.376434

ctf-bridgeoffate
29.509220 / 93.989052 / 191.483536 fps
Score = 94.127884


ATi Cat 4.2 1280x1024 (3D Slider set to Optimal Quality) 4XAA 16XAF

dm-rankin
32.509197 / 60.801651 / 124.405037 fps
Score = 60.877148

as-convoy
16.199684 / 41.273403 / 68.787109 fps
Score = 41.332363

ons-torlan
17.568087 / 59.579594 / 94.397133 fps
Score = 59.668827

br-colossus
22.746651 / 95.041153 / 173.152161 fps
Score = 95.167717

ctf-bridgeoffate
29.652433 / 94.173706 / 194.975067 fps
Score = 94.313263

 

[Technonut]

Originally posted by: SilverBack
I just redid mine, something is wrong with the CAT 4.2's when you select AA or AF by hand.
Below is simply the highest settings that you can set on the slider in the
3d settings applet.

BTW the game is really good looking at this level

I think it looks awesome too... This is what UT2003 should have been IMO.

I also like the option of being able to go into Spectator and max the Time Limit and Goal Scores to 999. Great addition to stability testing. Much more interesting than watching 3DMark loop..

Keep em' coming everyone... Very nice scores posted so far. I guess I will see what 3.6GHz / 5:4 will push me up to...

 

[THUGSROOK]

botmatch-all.bat does not worky

ill have to run them all seperately

 

[THUGSROOK]

im not yet running my optimal config......
2.4b @ 167fsb 3.0ghz / 334ddr c2622 streetracer / GFFX5900 @ 475x910

dm-rankin
33.967693 / 85.583855 / 164.810120 fps
Score = 85.628311

as-convoy
6.862843 / 46.820438 / 94.546867 fps
Score = 46.842587

ons-torlan
7.294326 / 73.407616 / 118.047539 fps
Score = 73.440636

br-colossus
23.037319 / 76.676369 / 191.619995 fps
Score = 76.719719

ctf-bridgeoffate
32.425163 / 108.340866 / 233.499969 fps
Score = 108.426910

 

[JustStarting]

why do I have such a wide range of FPS low to high?? My avg. is pretty much the same, but my range is way larger than everyone else's.

 

[Technonut]

Here is my max stable, air-cooled OC of 3625MHz / 5:4...

ATi Cat 4.2 1280x1024 (3D Slider set to Optimal Performance)

dm-rankin
38.390499 / 81.833015 / 139.400864 fps
Score = 81.895920

as-convoy
19.688200 / 49.175869 / 74.076309 fps
Score = 49.239193

ons-torlan
21.461155 / 87.479370 / 135.813248 fps
Score = 87.605598

br-colossus
30.002192 / 114.076508 / 252.674301 fps
Score = 114.225143

ctf-bridgeoffate
38.073383 / 140.646576 / 257.892029 fps
Score = 140.883881

ATi Cat 4.2 1280x1024 (3D Slider set to Optimal Quality) 4XAA 16XAF

dm-rankin
31.499350 / 60.907684 / 136.603683 fps
Score = 60.986095

as-convoy
19.323051 / 41.323368 / 66.882057 fps
Score = 41.374565

ons-torlan
10.034912 / 51.703625 / 103.468773 fps
Score = 51.784401

br-colossus
29.915194 / 87.850151 / 211.588730 fps
Score = 87.959869

ctf-bridgeoffate
37.792053 / 84.877220 / 240.782471 fps
Score = 84.983025

No earth-shattering difference jumping to 3.62GHz / 5:4 for me... :brokenheart: Oh well, back to 3437MHz / 1:1.... I like how snappy my rig feels there anyhow... Maybe I will throw my watercooling gear back together and shoot for 3.7GHz just for the helluvit though.

 

[slag]

TN, your scores surprise me because my scores are faster with a slower video card and a slower rig..

Whats the difference?

 

[Technonut]

Originally posted by: slag
TN, your scores surprise me because my scores are faster with a slower video card and a slower rig..

Whats the difference?

Do you have all the quality settings in the Demo maxed?

EDIT: I am running:

World Detail: High
Physics Detail: High
Dynamic Mesh LOD: Highest

EDIT: I will run the benchmarks again with the above settings @ default (Normal)...

 

[Technonut]

slag: Thanks for pointing that out to me... Everyone is more than likely running the Detail / LOD settings @ Normal. Here are benchmarks run @ my Sig specs @ Normal Detail / LOD... A little better huh? EDIT: slag: What were your Detail / LOD settings run @?

ATi Cat 4.2 1280x1024 (3D Slider set to Optimal Performance)

dm-rankin
44.503273 / 87.856682 / 229.879822 fps
Score = 87.957382

as-convoy
16.931063 / 55.186604 / 123.838516 fps
Score = 55.253113

ons-torlan
21.360823 / 88.656441 / 131.641388 fps
Score = 88.803719

br-colossus
32.450058 / 120.173424 / 245.161774 fps
Score = 120.333725

ctf-bridgeoffate
38.279648 / 142.582825 / 263.199432 fps
Score = 142.863007

ATi Cat 4.2 1280x1024 (3D Slider set to Optimal Quality) 4XAA 16XAF

dm-rankin
33.947819 / 68.081909 / 198.727264 fps
Score = 68.185234

as-convoy
17.071157 / 41.752213 / 124.919052 fps
Score = 41.800583

ons-torlan
18.478292 / 52.919529 / 113.325340 fps
Score = 52.998173

br-colossus
32.536503 / 89.858231 / 192.754318 fps
Score = 89.969398

ctf-bridgeoffate
35.281860 / 87.309799 / 244.991302 fps
Score = 87.445839

 

[Megatomic]

Most of the 5900 users are running with max quality settings (see my post above). Shouldn't the 9800 users do the same for the sake of apples to apples comparisions?

 

[Technonut]

Most of the 5900 users are running with max quality settings (see my post above). Shouldn't the 9800 users do the same for the sake of apples to apples comparisions?

I agree 100%... It is difficult to have apples to apples though when some people are running highly OC'ed video cards, and some @ stock... I am just trying to get a feel for how well OC'ed rigs in general (OC'ed video cards included) are handling the latest UT game. It appears that most are doing quite well. :beer:

As I said before, the Demo is also a great stability test for our OC'ed rigs when set to Spectator with the time and score limits maxed to 999... A nice bonus for a free Demo IMO.. The full version will be even better with the ability to add many bots and maps..

 

[Megatomic]

I couldn't agree with you more Technonut. :beer:

 

[slag]

ok, i put everything on high in the game and the slider on high in the 4.2 drivers.

dm-rankin
33.349567 / 60.739067 / 129.220474 fps
Score = 60.818871

as-convoy
16.104809 / 41.233444 / 67.580635 fps
Score = 41.292614

ons-torlan
17.284472 / 59.398067 / 94.929085 fps
Score = 59.483536

br-colossus
22.909908 / 95.384026 / 172.587173 fps
Score = 95.499657

ctf-bridgeoffate
30.170383 / 93.503792 / 186.324265 fps
Score = 93.637993

dm-rankin
34.052570 / 64.330559 / 104.198669 fps
Score = 64.402176

wow, I am getting spanked.