Post your Cpumark99 scores

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jul 27, 2020
26,280
18,087
146
Azure instance

1748103117637.png

Almost idle server (2 to 4% used by various processes) so clear indication that the benchmark thread was bounced around on all four cores (if it really is single threaded).
 
Jul 27, 2020
26,280
18,087
146
A user's 285K @ 5.7 GHz

1748164155394.png

I got a maximum of 838 @ P54 but task manager showed the frequency fluctuating between 5.07 to 5.35 GHz.

I'm almost sure that I got 855 at P55 but for some reason, the saved screenshot got corrupted (maybe P55 on 245KF is very unstable, even for single core).

I wonder if this benchmark is running on the E-cores or the score is so low because it is getting bounced around aggressively. Have to check it out later with Process Lasso.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Det0x

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,118
3,662
136
CPUmark99 has a tiny memory footprint. I wouldn't be surprised if it fit in the L1.
 

Det0x

Golden Member
Sep 11, 2014
1,459
4,971
136
Thats pretty strange, ecores have ~12% higher IPC than pcores in this benchmark 🧐

Pcore = 5700 / 889 = ~6.4 mhz per cpumark99 point
Ecore = 5100 / 899 = ~5.7 mhz per cpumark99 point
1748238782144.png