Post your 3DMARK05 SCORES.

[Trente]

3500 on 6600GT (stock) w/71.84

 

[Muhadib]

Check the sig below ;-p

 

[BillyBobJoel71]

i don't knoiw why. probably because my computer is not custom bult, its just a hp desktop i got at the store, but i upgraded stuff.

 

[Oceanic]

6600gt amd 64 3000+ specs in sig

4005

 

[videopho]

With latest Catalyst 5.4 driver (just downloaded today from ATI site):
3dmark05: 4600 @stock speed
4886 oc
The score's gone down approx. 3% from last Catalyst 5.3. Go figure!


My rig:
Dell Dim 4700 3.0ghz
1g DDR2 ram
g/c: X800XL PCI-x
HDTV Wonder pci
Dell 2500FPW display

 

[Cheesetogo]

Intel Extereme Graphics - 745,894,458,684,609 3dmarks. I unlocked the quantum proccesor on board that allowed me to feed the computer liquid nitrogen and urananium causing hydrogen fustion.

 

[Regs]

Originally posted by: Cheesetogo
Intel Extereme Graphics - 745,894,458,684,609 3dmarks. I unlocked the quantum proccesor on board that allowed me to feed the computer liquid nitrogen and urananium causing hydrogen fustion.

I was able to swtich the bus from electrons to photons and got a score of 1 billion or something.

SLI enabled added another 1 billion.

 

[Lemodular]

Ok back on subject.......
XFX 6600GT @ 577/1.17
driver 7.1.8.4

score: 4090

 

[kini62]

I just installed some "grey market" dilithium crystals- straight from the Enterprise.

I now score so high my 100,000 64 core, Power1000 processors have yet to finish computing the total and it's been running 24/7 for the last decade!

Time travel is so much fun!

 

[Burrbaby]

:laugh:

 

[billwinkle]

3dmark05 score. .0005
my original pong game machine.

 

[cubby1223]

decided to finally make the download...

score 3022 with an XFX 6600GT AGP @ stock 500/1000

side question, this is my first time running this software, how the heck is 3dMark05 supposed to represent current & near future games when the second to last test the fps was bouncing back & forth between 0 and 1?!!

 

[Rike]

4117 on my main rig (see sig)

A single XFX 6600GT @ 585/1210 on A8N SLI-Deluxe with 3200+ @ 2.54 Ghz

 

[blatherbeard]

P4 3.6g
1gig ram
fsb:200
6800GT@stock(351/1002)
driver version 71.84

48563demarks
3878cpumarks

project #:757880(not sure how to link it)

With the 66...drivers i scored under 4500

 

[Lemodular]

Just kicked it all the way to 597/1.18 stable and got 4194


PS...for under $200

 

[otispunkmeyer]

XG 71.84's

Core: 405Mhz
mem: 1.1Ghz
CPU: 2.4Ghz (AMD Athlon64 3200 NC)
Ram:220Mhz (220x11 10% OC)

score : 5440

not too shabby, considering a friend of mine, with a AXP system (Athlon XP 3200 @ 2.3ghz, 1.5Gb DDR400 6800Ultra) and his ULtra weighing in at 464Mhz core, 1.21Ghz mem only posted a 5410 score

 

[Geldy]

:music:

4273 - no overclocks

 

[Munky]

2924 with a 9800p @450/365, using catalyst 5.3 drivers. Don't know if other drivers will make much difference.

 

[Powered by AMD]

2875 (I post 2700) With 9800 Pro@412-370 (BBA R350)
On an Athlon XP Thoroughbred B@2200 (200x11) Cas 2-3-3-8 NForce2 MSI Platinum
TEXTURE QUALITY HIGH (IN CATALYST 3D OPTIONS).
Catalyst 5.3, NForce 5.1

 

[Munky]

Is that the deafault quality in the drivers? And is that what everyone is using? Because I'm sure I can brealk 3000 if I lower the IQ, but I consider that cheating, and I would not play games with lowered quality anyway.

 

[NEVERwinter]

R9600XT, Tbred 1700+ @ 2.1GHz = 165x
well, 3dmark05 doesn't encourage me to overclock more or upgrade my card -_- it's just suck

 

[edmundoab]

ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
stock speeds

2091

 

[y3llo]

both on drivers 71.68 or whatever was just released
old and busted (fx5200 128mb 64bit): 249 - no joke
new hotness (xfx 6600gt 500/1000): 3338
new hotness having fun (oc 533/1100 stock cooling): 3583

yeah i didn't bother to close programs or reboot, just wanted to ballpark a number =D

 

[ddogg]

6124
Geforce 6800 Ultra OCed to 456/1180

 

[Ronin]

10475