Originally posted by: Ackmed
Clearly looks like a jab to me. Had to drag me back into it, making false accusations. I NEVER said you were misleading people. I said it can be misleading. I havent changed my stance at all. I score 1700 points higher, by putting in a CPU that is 150Mhz slower, just because it had dual core. Fact is, that didnt make my PC 20% faster like 3dmark claimed. This thread is as useless as the program, Im done with it.
you were also offended when i called you a soldier, marine
and yet you are no longer offended
-what happened?
so now you think i took a "jab" at you ... and i am telling you i did not
otoh, "no false accusations" -
i really DID think you were
implying - at the very least -
i was misleading people by posting and using 3DMarkXX scores. You DO call the program "useless" [and misleading]. i figure since i am using it - recommending it and "supporting" it - i am also misleading - if not mislead, and i take DO issue with that [if it were true as i originally thought you were saying]
so now that you "clarified" your end - i see that we have no problem there
-are you still following me?
OK, so now you think it is still a "jab" but i say it was NOT - rather my attempt to finish our discussion once and for all - since you appear to never forget and also appear to hold "grudges" over unresolved issues
can you accept - now that i am clarifying - that it was not a Jab?
if so, we have no further problem and are "agreed" ... and i have no problem with your very specific example as i know how 3DMarkXX "weighs" it's Marks ... ALL benchmark tools - and even gaming benchmarks have their weaknesses.
BUT ... i will NEVER agree with you that "This thread is as useless as the program"; 3DMarkXX has its definite uses. And we can agree to disagree there.
if
not ... if you still have issues ... then please continue