Post your 3dmark scores

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777


With that said, I do think there is a lot of E-Penis type stuff that goes on with 3DMark06, though not in this thread that I have noticed. So what have I stated other than the obvious? Not much... Case Closed, issue solved.
uh oh, I need to work on my e-penis. 5910 is pretty small...
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
Originally posted by: Matt2
Broke 9k finally. Wo0t.
you broke 9k on an x1900xtx at 690/800 with a stock opteron 170? I need to go back to the drawing board I think...
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
Originally posted by: Matt2
Broke 9k finally. Wo0t.
you broke 9k on an x1900xtx at 690/800 with a stock opteron 170? I need to go back to the drawing board I think...

That's a negative. Opty 170 @ 2.7GHZ, 2900XT 815/900
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
gotcha. I followed your rig link and it still showed the x1900xtx. I looked at my 5910 with an opty 180 @2.6 and x1950xt at 662/945 and cringed.
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
You should be able to squeeze a lot more out of that X1950XT. I scored 6544 with my X1900XTX.
 

lopri

Elite Member
Jul 27, 2002
13,215
598
126
I dug up some pics from the past.


  1. E6600 @3.60GHz | 8800 GTX @625/1000 -- 12453

    E6400 @3.60GHz | 8800 GTS 320 @650/1000 -- 11491

    Opteron 165 @2.70GHz | 8800 GTS 320 @625/1000 -- 9675

    Q6600 @3.20GHz | 8600 GT @700/900 -- 6888
Shots contains detailed scores and FPS.
 

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Matt2
Broke 9k finally. Wo0t.

according to some posters it is meaningless and even misleading

i say "congratulations!" ... we know exactly what it means and how it feels to confirm what you know to be true about your system and our conscience can remain clear that we are not misleading anyone by posting and comparing "marks"

I might dare to suggest that you *let it go* :eek:

I think my beast of a rig pumped out about 5500 on 05.

XP@2.1Ghz, 1.5Gb RAM, Asus A7V8X, 6800GS@>U (AGP).

From what i recall, 06 makes it look plain silly, mainly because my CPU is slower than a slug that ate 11ty billion slug pellets, was run over by a small child on a tricycle, and then barbequed and eaten by a Frenchman :(
 

Ackmed

Diamond Member
Oct 1, 2003
8,487
532
126
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Matt2
Broke 9k finally. Wo0t.

according to some posters it is meaningless and even misleading

i say "congratulations!" ... we know exactly what it means and how it feels to confirm what you know to be true about your system and our conscience can remain clear that we are not misleading anyone by posting and comparing "marks"

When did I say that you were misleading anyone? Never. I said 3dmark itself can mislead people, with its end score. And it can. In fact, you even agreed with me that it can be misleading.

Couldnt let it go could you? Had to get another jab in. How sad.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Matt2
Broke 9k finally. Wo0t.

according to some posters it is meaningless and even misleading

i say "congratulations!" ... we know exactly what it means and how it feels to confirm what you know to be true about your system and our conscience can remain clear that we are not misleading anyone by posting and comparing "marks"

When did I say that you were misleading anyone? Never. I said 3dmark itself can mislead people, with its end score. And it can. In fact, you even agreed with me that it can be misleading.

Couldnt let it go could you? Had to get another jab in. How sad.
not a 'jab' - to congratulate Matt2 and get your attention ... read on:

Well, i could have 'let it go' ... but then i would no longer have a chance to agree with you further in this thread ;)

As you finally stated it - you are absolutely correct .. and thank-you for the acknowledgment that i am not misleading people by using 3DMarkXX as one of my 'tools'
--now that we have come to an agreement ... can you let it go?
-or should we? ... we can go on agreeing ... i can get used to it
:)
 

Ackmed

Diamond Member
Oct 1, 2003
8,487
532
126
Clearly looks like a jab to me. Had to drag me back into it, making false accusations. I NEVER said you were misleading people. I said it can be misleading. I havent changed my stance at all. I score 1700 points higher, by putting in a CPU that is 150Mhz slower, just because it had dual core. Fact is, that didnt make my PC 20% faster like 3dmark claimed. This thread is as useless as the program, Im done with it.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Clearly looks like a jab to me. Had to drag me back into it, making false accusations. I NEVER said you were misleading people. I said it can be misleading. I havent changed my stance at all. I score 1700 points higher, by putting in a CPU that is 150Mhz slower, just because it had dual core. Fact is, that didnt make my PC 20% faster like 3dmark claimed. This thread is as useless as the program, Im done with it.


you were also offended when i called you a soldier, marine

and yet you are no longer offended
-what happened?

so now you think i took a "jab" at you ... and i am telling you i did not

otoh, "no false accusations" - i really DID think you were implying - at the very least - i was misleading people by posting and using 3DMarkXX scores. You DO call the program "useless" [and misleading]. i figure since i am using it - recommending it and "supporting" it - i am also misleading - if not mislead, and i take DO issue with that [if it were true as i originally thought you were saying]

so now that you "clarified" your end - i see that we have no problem there
-are you still following me?

OK, so now you think it is still a "jab" but i say it was NOT - rather my attempt to finish our discussion once and for all - since you appear to never forget and also appear to hold "grudges" over unresolved issues

can you accept - now that i am clarifying - that it was not a Jab?

if so, we have no further problem and are "agreed" ... and i have no problem with your very specific example as i know how 3DMarkXX "weighs" it's Marks ... ALL benchmark tools - and even gaming benchmarks have their weaknesses.

BUT ... i will NEVER agree with you that "This thread is as useless as the program"; 3DMarkXX has its definite uses. And we can agree to disagree there.

if not ... if you still have issues ... then please continue
 

lopri

Elite Member
Jul 27, 2002
13,215
598
126
Ackmed: I thought we all knew 3DMark scores are, well, just 3DMark scores.. I do understand your concern knowing that there are 'is my 3DMark score good enough?' posts popping up once in a while. (But often times they're either bragging in disguise - like mines :p - or genuinely messed up systems from aspiring enthusiasts) Other than those few outlying cases, I'd like to think that the majority of the AT'ers do know what 3DMark is, and how to use it for her/his interest. Dunno if I'm thinking too positively but everyone knows that 3DMark scores are by no means representative for a system's performance. It's useful for stress testing and comparing scores with those of similarly configured systems, but that's just about it. I don't think many who participated in this thread were misled to anywhere. (Well, some might be having orgasm for finally getting a chance to show off her/his high scores so that could be considered *misleading* from the viewpoint of common decency)



;)
 

Laminator

Senior member
Jan 31, 2007
852
2
91
Hey, Ackmed, pretty much everyone here knows that 3DMark scores are not useful for determining real-world gaming performance but we like comparing our e-penises and this thread is also very helpful for people with similar systems to figure out if there is something wrong with their system performance. Also, what others said about system stability. So let's all be happy and keep benchmarking, okay? :)
 

lopri

Elite Member
Jul 27, 2002
13,215
598
126
Did your CPU score go up by 400 points, just from 200MHz overclock?!
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
Originally posted by: Matt2
You should be able to squeeze a lot more out of that X1950XT. I scored 6544 with my X1900XTX.
Ok, I just shut down my fx55 file server in preparation for a big parts sale (selling fx55, the skt 939 mobo it's in, a couple of agp vid cards, an athlon xp 2500+, some old/slow ram, a couple of skt 462 mobos) and stole the 500 mb pc 3200 ram out of it, so now I'm up to 1.5 gb ram vs the 1.0 that I was at before. I also jumped my gpu up to 675/945, which is about as high as catalyst will let me go. I know, I know, I had atitool before, but I was having some problems with that. The max I could get on atitool was 681 core at 900 mem, so I'm pushing the limit here. I'll also crank up the cpu to the max stable oc (about 2.63). If I break 6000 I'll be really pleased.
 

Mir96TA

Golden Member
Oct 21, 2002
1,950
37
91
Originally posted by: Mir96TA
Originally posted by: lopri
Originally posted by: Mir96TA
Originally posted by: Mir96TA
8469
9547
Over Clock 1:1 Mem ratio at 260 Mem speed
What is your core/memory frequencies?

  1. Opteron 165 @2.70GHz | 8800 GTS 320 @625/1000 -- 9675

Edit: LOL @your 'HDD Model'

Here are is Core SPeed
Mem Speed

Little Bit Updated
New score 1093
CPU Speed
Mem Speed
I think my CPU is running almost at P4 Netburst Temps
 

lopri

Elite Member
Jul 27, 2002
13,215
598
126
Mir96TA: I was wondering what your GPU and its memory speed were. Because your score from E4400 @2.60GHz and my score from 165 @2.70GHz was about the same. I should have been more clear with my question.

Oh and according to the ORB, your 'HDD Model' is "Digital Trash". What's up with that?! :D
 

Mir96TA

Golden Member
Oct 21, 2002
1,950
37
91
Originally posted by: lopri
Mir96TA: I was wondering what your GPU and its memory speed were. Because your score from E4400 @2.60GHz and my score from 165 @2.70GHz was about the same. I should have been more clear with my question.

Oh and according to the ORB, your 'HDD Model' is "Digital Trash". What's up with that?! :D

My Video Card is running Stock EVGA 8800 GTX 640 MB at speed Stock.
GPU=576 Mhz Mem=1008 Mhz
My HDD is mostly Holding Useless Stuff like Porn Pics Mp3 So I named it Digital Trash :laugh: